Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 28% Raft	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	32.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	65.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	8.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170605
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Jun 20 '17 at 21:41
Run Duration	203 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	19%

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X-$60 30,050 User benchmarks, average bench 72% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	74.7% Very good	Memory 77.8 1-Core 116 2-Core 216 77% 137 Pts	4-Core 384 8-Core 768 68% 576 Pts	64-Core 1,239 77% 1,239 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 74.7% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500 94,130 User benchmarks, average bench 35% Sapphire(174B 3001) CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 17.6.1 Performing below potential (28^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	32.7% Below average	Lighting 42.2 Reflection 26.2 Parallax 47.9 34% 38.7 fps	MRender 31.4 Gravity 38.2 Splatting 37.7 30% 35.7 fps
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 32.7% Great: 39%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 48GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 3257 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 674 (B1) Unknown 99 99 6 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 51 35 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 49 (F1) Unknown 99 99 5956327465	83.4% Excellent	Read 512 Write 412 Mixed 417 100% 447 MB/s	4K Read 32.2 4K Write 55.2 4K Mixed 26.9 113% 38.1 MB/s	DQ Read 66.1 DQ Write 101 DQ Mixed 33.3 39% 66.8 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 83.4% Great: 134%
Samsung 840 Pro 128GB-$150 34,842 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 13GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXM06B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 7126 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1415 (B1) Unknown 93 93 246 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 59 35 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 88 (F1) Unknown 99 99 25064389971	65.8% Good	Read 503 Write 197 Mixed 229 68% 310 MB/s	4K Read 27.4 4K Write 61.9 4K Mixed 20.3 100% 36.5 MB/s	DQ Read 62 DQ Write 110 DQ Mixed 39.6 43% 70.5 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 65.8% Great: 110%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 500GB-$80 27,325 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 204GB free Firmware: SD15 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 112 96 158977698 (03) Spinup time 94 91 0 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3978 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 54 (07) Seek error rate 39 37 6537501831655 (09) Power-on hours count 71 71 25793 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 9 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 4033 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 96 12885164743 (BD) vendor-specific 56 56 44 (BE) vendor-specific 69 60 571998239 (C2) HDA temperature 31 40 47244640287 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 27 16 158977698 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	57.2% Above average	Read 99.7 Write 99.6 Mixed 84.3 71% 94.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.54 4K Write 1.56 4K Mixed 0.46 103% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 57.2% Great: 59%
Seagate BUP BK 4TB 970 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 656GB free, PID ab28 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	52.8% Above average	Read 73.4 Write 101 Mixed 63 104% 79 MB/s	4K Read 1.61 4K Write 6.47 4K Mixed 0.34 238% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 52.8% Great: 57%
ASMT 2105 1TB 1,332 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 182GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	65.8% Good	Read 166 Write 173 Mixed 137 203% 159 MB/s	4K Read 0.85 4K Write 1.24 4K Mixed 0.22 53% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 65.8% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$40 653,654 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 3066 MHz clocked @ 1533 MHz Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	47.8% Average	MC Read 18.8 MC Write 14.9 MC Mixed 15.3 47% 16.3 GB/s	SC Read 15.2 SC Write 15.5 SC Mixed 16.5 45% 15.7 GB/s	Latency 84.7 47% 84.7 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 47.8% Great: 110%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,522 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	416x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	214x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	188x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	160x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	122x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $37Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $847

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $275	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)