Sony VGN-FE31ZR

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 25% Raft	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.39% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	11.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Sony VGN-FE31ZR (all builds)
Motherboard	Sony VAIO
Memory	0.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20070524
Uptime	2.6 Days
Run Date	Jun 23 '17 at 23:58
Run Duration	312 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 T5600-$99 1,304 User benchmarks, average bench 31% N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.85 GHz Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	25.2% Poor	Memory 44.9 1-Core 19.6 2-Core 35.7 24% 33.4 Pts	4-Core 34.3 8-Core 35.1 5% 34.7 Pts	64-Core 38.8 2% 38.8 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 25.2% Great: 36%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce Go 7600 397 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Sony(104D 81EF) 128MB Driver: nvd3dum Ver. 7.15.11.7948 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.39% Terrible	Lighting 0.73 Reflection 0.81 Parallax 0.03 1% 0.52 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.39% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
120gb SSD 120GB 3,247 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 95GB free (System drive) Firmware: V3.7 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 176 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 9 (A1) Unknown 100 100 0 (A4) Unknown 100 100 502 (A5) Unknown 100 100 2 (A6) Unknown 100 100 1 (A7) Unknown 100 100 1 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 47 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 48 (F2) Unknown 100 100 74 (F3) Unknown 100 100 0 (F4) Unknown 100 100 0 (F5) Unknown 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 0 (FA) Read error retry rate 100 100 0 (FB) Unknown 100 100 0 (FC) Unknown 100 100 0 (FD) Unknown 100 100 0 (FE) Unknown 100 100 0	11.7% Very poor	Read 30.3 Write 29.4 Mixed 27.8 6% 29.2 MB/s	4K Read 11.1 4K Write 15.7 4K Mixed 2.46 28% 9.77 MB/s	DQ Read 13.3 DQ Write 20 DQ Mixed 3.88 6% 12.4 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 11.7% Great: 80%
Toshiba HDWJ105 500GB 1,334 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 349GB free Firmware: AX001A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 1108 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 18 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 217 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 18 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 3 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 0 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 3542 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 171800133667 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 0 (DE) Loaded hours 100 100 29 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 255 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	51.4% Above average	Read 86.7 Write 92.8 Mixed 32.6 52% 70.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.37 4K Write 0.82 4K Mixed 0.08 39% 0.42 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 51.4% Great: 62%
JetFlash Transcend 16GB 14,782 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 8GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	7.87% Terrible	Read 32.3 Write 9.82 Mixed 9.36 17% 17.2 MB/s	4K Read 4.33 4K Write 0.006 4K Mixed 0.007 16% 1.45 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 7.87% Great: 33%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR2 Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	10.3% Very poor	MC Read 4.2 MC Write 2.8 MC Mixed 2.9 9% 3.3 GB/s	SC Read 3.1 SC Write 2.3 SC Mixed 2.5 8% 2.63 GB/s	Latency 181 22% 181 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 10.3% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Sony VGN-FE31ZR

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)