Asus P7P55D

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	35.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus P7P55D (all builds)
Memory	4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20100722
Uptime	1.3 Days
Run Date	Jul 04 '17 at 14:55
Run Duration	349 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	46%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 661-$80 2,457 User benchmarks, average bench 50% LGA1156, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.35 GHz Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	53.5% Above average	Memory 71.3 1-Core 66.5 2-Core 132 54% 89.8 Pts	4-Core 206 8-Core 215 28% 211 Pts	64-Core 211 13% 211 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 53.5% Great: 55%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 600 15,964 User benchmarks, average bench 3% HP(103C 0835) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 311.66 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 3% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Corsair Force 40GB-$94 346 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 24GB free Firmware: 2.2 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 3375487 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 94214402625755 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2155 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 40 (B1) Unknown 0 0 1 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 30 30 128850984990 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 3375487 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 128 (EA) Unknown 0 0 192 (F1) Unknown 0 0 192 (F2) Unknown 0 0 1728	27.5% Poor	Read 138 Write 49.1 Mixed 69.1 19% 85.4 MB/s	4K Read 18.7 4K Write 42.8 4K Mixed 8.09 61% 23.2 MB/s	DQ Read 20.7 DQ Write 41.9 DQ Mixed 7.55 12% 23.4 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 27.5% Great: 44%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 14GB free (System drive) Firmware: 603ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 13509910 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 91 91 -122775935114735 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 455 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 17 (B1) Unknown 0 0 1 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 34 39 17182425122 (C2) HDA temperature 34 39 17182425122 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 13509910 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 13509910 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 13509910 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 98 98 4294967297 (E9) Unknown 0 0 11974 (EA) Unknown 0 0 5821 (F1) Unknown 0 0 5821 (F2) Unknown 0 0 2993 (F4) Unknown 98 98 5636179	35.4% Below average	Read 194 Write 99 Mixed 127 31% 140 MB/s	4K Read 14.3 4K Write 63.7 4K Mixed 8.51 66% 28.8 MB/s	DQ Read 23.3 DQ Write 93.8 DQ Mixed 5.32 20% 40.8 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 35.4% Great: 73%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23 63,281 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 130GB free Firmware: 01.00A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 184 179 3791 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5099 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 72 72 20608 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2145 (C0) Power-off retract count 198 198 1704 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 145 145 166695 (C2) HDA temperature 107 104 36 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	32.9% Below average	Read 56.9 Write 57.7 Mixed 25.9 34% 46.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.09 4K Mixed 0.23 67% 0.61 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 32.9% Great: 54%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 8GB 12,066 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 5GB free, PID 6544 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 22.6 Write 3.44 Mixed 5.38 10% 10.5 MB/s	4K Read 3.93 44% 3.93 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8GB 82,857 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	31.9% Below average	MC Read 10.6 MC Write 9.2 MC Mixed 13.8 32% 11.2 GB/s	SC Read 8.3 SC Write 6.6 SC Mixed 7.8 22% 7.57 GB/s	Latency 98.4 41% 98.4 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 31.9% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P7P55D Builds (Compare 1,212 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 20%

Surfboard

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P7P55D

CPU
Core i5-750Intel $72Bench 62%, 43,796 samples	397x
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	251x
Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples	177x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	61x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	54x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	45x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	61x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	29x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	27x

RAM
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	402x
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	375x
12GBUnknownBench 35%, 85,415 samples	168x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $159

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16