Asus B85M-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics59.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus B85M-E  (all builds)
Memory14 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20161128
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 06 '17 at 09:41
Run Duration278 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690K-$53
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
79.1% Very good
Memory 78
1-Core 119
2-Core 236
80% 144 Pts
4-Core 463
8-Core 461
62% 462 Pts
64-Core 462
29% 462 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 382.5
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
59.7% Above average
Lighting 74.1
Reflection 73.3
Parallax 63.9
60% 70.5 fps
MRender 73.1
Gravity 69.2
Splatting 71.3
58% 71.2 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD7TB3Q-128G-1006 128GB
93GB free
Firmware: X2180306 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 60% Great: 94%
Kingston SSDNow V+200 Series 120GB
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 507KC4 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
38.5% Below average
Read 183
Write 102
Mixed 115
30% 134 MB/s
4K Read 17.2
4K Write 60.6
4K Mixed 10.7
72% 29.5 MB/s
DQ Read 97
DQ Write 92.8
DQ Mixed 26.8
39% 72.2 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 83%
Toshiba DT01ABA200 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: MZ4OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
72.5% Very good
Read 136
Write 117
Mixed 83.2
83% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.35
4K Write 1.64
4K Mixed 0.18
65% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 85%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100
477GB free
Firmware: 1AA01118 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 31% Great: 62%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 8GB-$7
3GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
8.75% Terrible
Read 29.5
Write 6.76
Mixed 10.4
16% 15.6 MB/s
4K Read 9.31
4K Write 0.26
4K Mixed 0.08
46% 3.22 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 8.75%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
57.4% Above average
MC Read 21
MC Write 22.8
MC Mixed 18.1
59% 20.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 18.6
SC Mixed 15.6
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 84.3
48% 84.3 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B85M-E Builds (Compare 2,924 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus B85M-E - $106

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $343
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback