| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 30.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 36.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus P5P43TD (all builds) |
| Memory | 8.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20091030 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 08 '17 at 01:53 |
| Run Duration | 157 Seconds |
| Run User | COL-User |
| Background CPU | 48% |
PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
47.6%
Average
|
45% 65.8 Pts
|
14% 113 Pts
|
10% 157 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Zotac(19DA A454) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 382.53
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
30.3%
Below average
|
31% 33.9 fps
|
29% 35.3 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89
127GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3J96R9 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
36.9%
Below average
|
38% 171 MB/s
|
53% 16 MB/s
|
30% 59.9 MB/s
|
|
|
44.2%
Average
|
59% 77.7 MB/s
|
67% 0.64 MB/s
| |
|
|
55.2%
Above average
|
67% 89.1 MB/s
|
86% 0.65 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
|
21.9%
Poor
|
20% 6.93 GB/s
|
15% 5.37 GB/s
|
50% 80.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P5P43TD Builds (Compare 120 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P5P43TD
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core2 Quad Q9650Intel $170Bench 51%, 16,719 samples | 19x |
| Core2 Quad Q8300Intel $115Bench 44%, 20,482 samples | 9x |
| Core2 Duo E7500Intel $109Bench 39%, 39,897 samples | 9x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 8x |
| GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples | 6x |
| GeForce GTS 250NvidiaBench 7%, 14,881 samples | 5x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 50% - Above average | Total price: $290 |