Asus H110M-A/M.2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics12.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive54.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsus H110M-A/M.2  (all builds)
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170418
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 14 '17 at 18:49
Run Duration287 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$95
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
82.6% Excellent
Memory 91.1
1-Core 113
2-Core 220
81% 141 Pts
4-Core 428
8-Core 429
57% 429 Pts
64-Core 429
27% 429 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 460-$203
EVGA(3842 1360) 768MB
CLim: 675 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 768MB, Driver: 382.53
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
12.2% Very poor
Lighting 14.4
Reflection 16.9
Parallax 12.8
12% 14.7 fps
MRender 19.5
Gravity 14.6
Splatting 14.4
13% 16.2 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 830 128GB-$109
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM03B1Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
54.6% Above average
Read 487
Write 214
Mixed 304
74% 335 MB/s
4K Read 18.4
4K Write 56.7
4K Mixed 10.3
71% 28.5 MB/s
DQ Read 17.4
DQ Write 53.6
DQ Mixed 53.6
36% 41.5 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 76%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49
937GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
64.5% Good
Read 104
Write 121
Mixed 97.1
80% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.64
4K Mixed 0.18
72% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 84%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2016)-$114
809GB free
Firmware: 0001 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
69.3% Good
Read 119
Write 123
Mixed 109
88% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.73
4K Write 1.83
4K Mixed 0.28
95% 0.95 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 105%
USB 2.0 Flash Disk 1GB
1GB free, PID 2168
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
4.45% Terrible
Read 7.74
Write 7.2
Mixed 6.69
9% 7.21 MB/s
4K Read 4.44
4K Write 0.23
4K Mixed 0.23
32% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.45%
Great: 4%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFS8213.C8FDR1 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
41.5% Average
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 11
39% 13.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 11.7
37% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 65.6
61% 65.6 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M-A/M.2 Builds (Compare 3,117 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus H110M-A/M.2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $234
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback