Asus P9X79

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics17.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive76.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory40GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 40GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus P9X79  (all builds)
Memory29.9 GB free of 40 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140506
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJul 19 '17 at 16:52
Run Duration445 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3930K-$280
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
73% Very good
Memory 85.4
1-Core 92.8
2-Core 186
70% 121 Pts
4-Core 327
8-Core 580
55% 453 Pts
64-Core 704
44% 704 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 73%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560 Ti-$188
Asus(1043 838B) 1GB
CLim: 830 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 347.52
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
17.3% Very poor
Lighting 20.3
Reflection 23.7
Parallax 18.2
16% 20.7 fps
MRender 25.9
Gravity 21.3
Splatting 22
19% 23.1 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 830 256GB-$261
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B1Q
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
76.7% Very good
Read 497
Write 320
Mixed 368
88% 395 MB/s
4K Read 21.3
4K Write 63.3
4K Mixed 22.5
94% 35.7 MB/s
DQ Read 296
DQ Write 94
DQ Mixed 72
85% 154 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 86%
Samsung PM81 128GB
15GB free
Firmware: 8D1Q
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
44.1% Average
Read 243
Write 243
Mixed 172
49% 219 MB/s
4K Read 16.3
4K Write 36.6
4K Mixed 8.17
55% 20.4 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 50.3
DQ Mixed 8.61
26% 58.9 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 50%
WD Green 6TB (2014)-$223
2TB free
Firmware: 0A80
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
52.6% Above average
Read 92
Write 90.8
Mixed 89.3
68% 90.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.95
4K Write 2.57
4K Mixed 0.21
110% 1.24 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 98%
WD Black 6TB (2015)-$296
308GB free
Firmware: 1A01
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
132% Outstanding
Read 216
Write 245
Mixed 189
162% 216 MB/s
4K Read 2.79
4K Write 3.27
4K Mixed 0.32
212% 2.12 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 132%
Great: 118%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
195GB free
Firmware: 0A80
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
43.4% Average
Read 77.5
Write 73.5
Mixed 77.8
58% 76.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.76
4K Write 1.97
4K Mixed 0.26
97% 1 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 83%
USB Flash Disk 8GB
0GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
7.83% Terrible
Read 24.2
Write 10.7
Mixed 8.63
16% 14.5 MB/s
4K Read 8.35
4K Write 0.006
4K Mixed 0.009
31% 2.79 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.83%
Great: 9%
USB Flash Disk 8GB
0GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
6.7% Terrible
Read 24.4
Write 5.42
Mixed 5.75
11% 11.9 MB/s
4K Read 8.33
4K Write 0.004
4K Mixed 0.005
31% 2.78 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.7%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMX32GX3M4A1600C1 CMX32GX3M4A1600C1 CMX16GX3M4A1600C9 CMX32GX3M4A1600C1 CMX32GX3M4A1600C1 CMX16GX3M4A1600C9 40GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 4096, 8192, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
55.8% Above average
MC Read 22
MC Write 19.6
MC Mixed 19.2
58% 20.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 12.5
SC Mixed 11.6
36% 12.6 GB/s
Latency 71.7
56% 71.7 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P9X79 Builds (Compare 1,697 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus P9X79 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $512
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback