Asus M32CD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics56.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive71.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus M32CD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK M32CD
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151028
Uptime2 Days
Run DateJul 23 '17 at 22:28
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 18%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400-$79
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
76.4% Very good
Memory 84.3
1-Core 102
2-Core 198
74% 128 Pts
4-Core 396
8-Core 400
53% 398 Pts
64-Core 395
24% 395 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 384.76
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (69 fps cap detected)
56.9% Above average
Lighting 70.2
Reflection 68.5
Parallax 52.9
57% 63.9 fps
MRender 68.9
Gravity 67.9
Splatting 69.3
56% 68.7 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS1311 120GB-$63
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS131122 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
71.9% Very good
Read 509
Write 333
Mixed 347
88% 396 MB/s
4K Read 31.3
4K Write 63.1
4K Mixed 9.53
93% 34.6 MB/s
DQ Read 32.4
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 9.52
38% 79.4 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 91%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$58
327GB free
Firmware: AX1P1A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
46.2% Average
Read 81.5
Write 79.6
Mixed 75.4
59% 78.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 1.45
4K Mixed 0.17
65% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 62%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31
15GB free
Firmware: MS2OA7L0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
53.7% Above average
Read 102
Write 85.2
Mixed 93.6
70% 93.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.68
4K Write 1.42
4K Mixed 0.19
76% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73EB0-YK0 1315 CT102464BD160B.M16 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
58.4% Above average
MC Read 21.2
MC Write 20.8
MC Mixed 18.7
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 21.6
SC Mixed 19.3
52% 18.3 GB/s
Latency 73
55% 73 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M32CD Builds (Compare 290 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Asus M32CD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $107
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback