Asus Z9PE-D8 WS

Performance Results


Gaming 23% Surfboard	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 25% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	17.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	141% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Asus Z9PE-D8 WS (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK Z9PE-D8 WS
Memory	57.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150610
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 25 '17 at 04:38
Run Duration	201 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W 0 1,646 User benchmarks, average bench 71% Socket-R 2011, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	75.6% Very good	Memory 83.2 1-Core 94.3 2-Core 187 70% 121 Pts	4-Core 366 8-Core 704 64% 535 Pts	64-Core 1,808 112% 1,808 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 75.6% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% MSI(1462 3604) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 384.94 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	17.6% Very poor	Lighting 19.9 Reflection 23 Parallax 18.7 16% 20.5 fps	MRender 28.4 Gravity 19.9 Splatting 26 20% 24.8 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 17.6% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 1TB-$199 23,857 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 429GB free Firmware: DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 9361 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 3984 (B1) Unknown 99 99 12 (B3) Unknown 100 1 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 48 30 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 1416 (F1) Unknown 99 99 27905243497	57.1% Above average	Read 488 Write 114 Mixed 277 64% 293 MB/s	4K Read 26.7 4K Write 47.5 4K Mixed 18.1 89% 30.8 MB/s	DQ Read 97.1 DQ Write 95.7 DQ Mixed 39.5 45% 77.4 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 57.1% Great: 126%
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$625 54,978 User benchmarks, average bench 223% 173GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	141% Outstanding	Read 1,100 Write 806 Mixed 928 210% 945 MB/s	4K Read 29 4K Write 75.5 4K Mixed 39.9 135% 48.1 MB/s	DQ Read 97.8 DQ Write 146 DQ Mixed 56.2 61% 100 MB/s
Poor: 138% ↑ This bench: 141% Great: 283%
Marvell Raid VD 0 8TB 44 User benchmarks, average bench 126% 3.5TB free Firmware: MV.R00-0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value	221% Outstanding	Read 468 Write 300 Mixed 288 263% 352 MB/s	4K Read 2.14 4K Write 4.92 4K Mixed 0.44 229% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 221% Great: 184%
Intel Raid 5 Volume 8.5TB 30 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 6.5TB free Firmware: 1.0. Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	262% Outstanding	Read 694 Write 217 Mixed 182 268% 364 MB/s	4K Read 17.9 4K Write 2.85 4K Mixed 0.38 840% 7.04 MB/s
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 262% Great: 200%
Toshiba X300 4TB-$146 23,740 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 1TB free Firmware: FP2A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 7000 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 2286 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 90 90 4292 (0A) Spinup retry count 145 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1751 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 116 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 469 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 2575 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 214749610017 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 253 9 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 0 (DE) Loaded hours 90 90 4188 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 211 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	80.7% Excellent	Read 139 Write 141 Mixed 134 104% 138 MB/s	4K Read 2.3 4K Write 1.84 4K Mixed 0.3 164% 1.48 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 80.7% Great: 104%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CL9-10-9 D3-186 8x8GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 8 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	98.3% Outstanding	MC Read 43.6 MC Write 41.3 MC Mixed 35 114% 40 GB/s	SC Read 13.3 SC Write 6.1 SC Mixed 7.8 26% 9.07 GB/s	Latency 74.8 54% 74.8 ns
Poor: 95% ↑ This bench: 98.3% Great: 98%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z9PE-D8 WS Builds (Compare 222 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 68%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 89%

Aircraft carrier

System: Asus Z9PE-D8 WS

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2697 v21stBench 64%, 772 samples	20x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	16x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 01stBench 65%, 4,306 samples	15x

GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia $275Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	14x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $499Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	14x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	10x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	13x
840 Pro 256GBSamsung $190Bench 95%, 73,119 samples	11x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	10x

RAM
M393B1G73QH0-YK 8x8GBSamsungBench 81%, 8 samples	7x
HMT31GR7EFR4C-R 7x8GBHynixBench 91%, 9 samples	7x
9905403-582.A00 8x8GBKingstonBench 85%, 7 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $384

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16