PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 34.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 46.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asus Crosshair IV Formula (all builds) |
Memory | 12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.5 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20110401 |
Uptime | 0.2 Days |
Run Date | Jul 27 '17 at 21:06 |
Run Duration | 244 Seconds |
Run User | ZAF-User |
Background CPU | 2% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
62.3%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 280X-$500
AMD(1002 0B00) 3GB
CLim: 925 MHz, MLim: 1375 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 17.3.2
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
34.5%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
46.3%
Average
|
||||
80.4%
Excellent
|
||||
63.2%
Good
|
||||
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB
3GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
|
12%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston 9905403-447.A00LF 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM 533 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
31.9%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples | 120x |
Phenom II X6 1100TAMD $340Bench 59%, 12,769 samples | 34x |
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples | 31x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 15x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 12x |
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 10x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 54% - Above average | Total price: $520 |