HP EliteBook 820 G3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive58.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Very high background CPU (60%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemHP EliteBook 820 G3  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 807C
Memory2.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20170412
Uptime4.4 Days
Run DateAug 04 '17 at 22:30
Run Duration467 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 60%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6300U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
64.4% Good
Memory 86.7
1-Core 92.5
2-Core 154
67% 111 Pts
4-Core 246
8-Core 245
33% 246 Pts
64-Core 244
15% 244 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
HP(103C 807C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4457
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
5.7% Terrible
Lighting 6.4
Reflection 8
Parallax 5.94
5% 6.78 fps
MRender 5.24
Gravity 5.13
Splatting 12.2
7% 7.52 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.7%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SN8U-256G-1006 256GB
162GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X4120006 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Read 454
Write 304
Mixed 272
76% 343 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 36.6
4K Mixed 12.3
70% 24 MB/s
DQ Read 26.2
DQ Write 45.2
DQ Mixed 11.7
16% 27.7 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 92%
Lexar JumpDrive S25 USB 3.0 32GB-$13
12GB free, PID a838
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
8.49% Terrible
Read 26.9
Write 8.95
Mixed 25.2
24% 20.3 MB/s
4K Read 2.35
4K Write 0.68
4K Mixed 0.47
48% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 8.49%
Great: 33%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 64GB
8GB free, PID a81d
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
4.55% Terrible
Read 15.6
Write 6.93
Mixed 10.6
13% 11 MB/s
4K Read 3.22
4K Write 0.004
4K Mixed 0.004
12% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.55%
Great: 9%
SanDisk Ultra USB 2.0 32GB
2GB free, PID 556c
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
5.15% Terrible
Read 17.9
Write 6.66
Mixed 8.99
12% 11.2 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 0.12
4K Mixed 0.21
23% 1.14 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.15%
Great: 11%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
37.9% Below average
MC Read 13.3
MC Write 13.2
MC Mixed 10.6
35% 12.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 13.3
SC Mixed 11.8
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 70.7
57% 70.7 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 820 G3 Builds (Compare 1,231 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 820 G3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback