Asus P6X58D-E

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	6.08% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus P6X58D-E (all builds)
Memory	5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120806
Uptime	1.2 Days
Run Date	Aug 12 '17 at 19:30
Run Duration	150 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	15%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 X 990-$499 4,994 User benchmarks, average bench 78% LGA1366, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.45 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	79.3% Very good	Memory 95.2 1-Core 89.3 2-Core 178 72% 121 Pts	4-Core 343 8-Core 540 54% 442 Pts	64-Core 678 42% 678 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 79.3% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Gigabyte(1458 3739) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 384.94 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	6.08% Terrible	Lighting 6.67 Reflection 8.04 Parallax 6.75 5% 7.15 fps	MRender 8.52 Gravity 9.03 Splatting 9.17 7% 8.91 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 6.08% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$210 68,849 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 110GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM04B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 784 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 749 (B1) Unknown 99 99 10 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 61 50 39 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 2 (EB) Unknown 99 99 717 (F1) Unknown 99 99 8730062570
Poor: 71% Great: 124%
Toshiba X300 4TB-$146 23,740 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 3TB free Firmware: FP2A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 3782 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 85 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 132 (0A) Spinup retry count 101 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 71 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 2 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 5 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 126 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 219044511785 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 253 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 0 (DE) Loaded hours 100 100 121 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 575 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	103% Outstanding	Read 180 Write 178 Mixed 165 131% 175 MB/s	4K Read 4.22 4K Write 2.36 4K Mixed 0.27 250% 2.28 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 104%
Samsung Spinpoint F2 1TB-$60 32,476 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 750GB free Firmware: 1AG01118 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 99 99 6038 (03) Spinup time 77 77 7720 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 1745 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 253 253 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2055 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1177 (0D) Soft read error rate 99 99 6034 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 1 1 300 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 6043 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 79 58 353370133 (C2) HDA temperature 71 53 487587869 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 282664 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 99 99 47 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 82020 (C8) Write error rate 100 99 1 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 253 0	52.2% Above average	Read 91 Write 90.9 Mixed 85 67% 89 MB/s	4K Read 0.35 4K Write 1.48 4K Mixed 0.41 88% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 52.2% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 6 slots used 8GB DIMM Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	41.2% Average	MC Read 15.7 MC Write 14.1 MC Mixed 11.2 39% 13.7 GB/s	SC Read 11.5 SC Write 8.8 SC Mixed 12 31% 10.8 GB/s	Latency 56.6 71% 56.6 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 41.2% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P6X58D-E Builds (Compare 1,351 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P6X58D-E

CPU
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples	496x
Core i7 930Intel $199Bench 64%, 19,497 samples	198x
Core i7 960Intel $220Bench 68%, 16,233 samples	145x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	74x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	74x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	68x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	47x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	40x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	40x

RAM
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples	231x
6x2GBUnknownBench 46%, 38,297 samples	221x
3x4GBUnknownBench 42%, 39,448 samples	132x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $289

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16