Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 25% Raft	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	35.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	91.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20130711
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Aug 19 '17 at 14:55
Run Duration	207 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T-$175 23,835 User benchmarks, average bench 54% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	63.8% Good	Memory 92.6 1-Core 48.1 2-Core 95.5 53% 78.7 Pts	4-Core 192 8-Core 287 30% 239 Pts	64-Core 286 18% 286 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 63.8% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198 440,282 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Gigabyte(1458 36BE) CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 376.33 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	35.5% Below average	Lighting 46.1 Reflection 44.3 Parallax 39.8 38% 43.4 fps	MRender 39.6 Gravity 40.8 Splatting 36 32% 38.8 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 35.5% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HFS500G32TND-3112A 500GB 315 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 284GB free (System drive) Firmware: 30060P00 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 166 166 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 3 (09) Power-on hours count 92 92 7256 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 696 (64) Unknown 100 100 8254765 (AB) Unknown 253 253 0 (AC) Unknown 253 253 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 30 (AF) Unknown 253 253 0 (B0) Unknown 253 253 0 (B1) Unknown 98 98 13 (B2) Unknown 100 100 50 (B3) Unknown 100 100 880 (B4) Unknown 100 100 13008 (B5) Unknown 253 253 0 (B6) Unknown 253 253 0 (B7) Unknown 253 253 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 3 (BC) Unknown 253 253 0 (BF) G-sense error rate 253 253 0 (C2) HDA temperature 31 0 5111839 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 1 1 4294967295 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 97 1 890 (E7) Temperature 99 99 2 (EA) Unknown 100 100 6299 (EB) Unknown 100 100 7187 (F1) Unknown 100 100 8422 (F2) Unknown 100 100 10059 (FA) Read error retry rate 100 100 1997121	91.3% Outstanding	Read 496 Write 445 Mixed 393 99% 445 MB/s	4K Read 30.9 4K Write 61.6 4K Mixed 33.2 122% 41.9 MB/s	DQ Read 163 DQ Write 140 DQ Mixed 78.6 79% 127 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 91.3% Great: 107%
SanDisk Ultra 120GB 552 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 70GB free Firmware: 365A13F0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 104 99 7822906 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 -26388279051312 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1747 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 81 (B1) Unknown 0 0 2 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 30 30 128850984990 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 104 99 7822906 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 15872 (EA) Unknown 0 0 9792 (F1) Unknown 0 0 9792 (F2) Unknown 0 0 19136	37.1% Below average	Read 205 Write 79.4 Mixed 108 29% 131 MB/s	4K Read 15.3 4K Write 50.7 4K Mixed 13.3 67% 26.4 MB/s	DQ Read 102 DQ Write 85 DQ Mixed 28.8 39% 72 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 37.1% Great: 51%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$40 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1TB free Firmware: CC44 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 119 99 233816096 (03) Spinup time 91 90 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1863 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 57 51 30068961407 (09) Power-on hours count 90 90 9364 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1402 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 99 99 1 (BE) vendor-specific 59 46 47933882409 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 99 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 4895 (C2) HDA temperature 41 54 -140737488355287 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 82278688497726 (F1) Unknown 100 253 20481858348 (F2) Unknown 100 253 27468316287	95.7% Outstanding	Read 195 Write 139 Mixed 64.9 98% 133 MB/s	4K Read 0.58 4K Write 1.32 4K Mixed 0.27 78% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 95.7% Great: 113%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100 65,786 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 401GB free Firmware: 1AA01118 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 67 67 10810 (04) Start/Stop count 93 93 6736 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 18678 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 1 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 3536 (0D) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 59 537853982 (C2) HDA temperature 68 58 554631200 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 128527 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 253 0	49.2% Average	Read 88.2 Write 82.8 Mixed 84.4 64% 85.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.75 4K Write 1.99 4K Mixed 0.52 126% 1.09 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 49.2% Great: 62%
Seagate BUP Slim RD 2TB 279 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 625GB free, PID ab24 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	57.5% Above average	Read 112 Write 126 Mixed 27.6 107% 88.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.59 4K Write 4.42 4K Mixed 0.37 165% 1.79 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 57.5% Great: 55%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL TridentX DDR3 2400 C10 2x4GB 6,123 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	35.2% Below average	MC Read 15.9 MC Write 7.1 MC Mixed 13 34% 12 GB/s	SC Read 7.2 SC Write 6 SC Mixed 8 20% 7.07 GB/s	Latency 63 64% 63 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 35.2% Great: 90%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M5A97 EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 581 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 38%

Jet ski

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 31%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0 - $166

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	227x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	102x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	95x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	41x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	30x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	27x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	29x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	21x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	18x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	22x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	12x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GBHyperX $35Bench 51%, 38,490 samples	12x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 70% - Very good

Total price: $512

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16