Gigabyte GA-P55M-UD4

Performance Results


Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 15% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	17.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	70% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-P55M-UD4 (all builds)
Memory	8.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20100719
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 20 '17 at 11:01
Run Duration	188 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 860-$339 51,451 User benchmarks, average bench 64% Socket 1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	77.1% Very good	Memory 95.9 1-Core 89.5 2-Core 179 72% 121 Pts	4-Core 317 8-Core 451 48% 384 Pts	64-Core 450 28% 450 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 77.1% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 290X-$549 37,353 User benchmarks, average bench 51% Gigabyte(1458 2281) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1260 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.7.1 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	17.1% Very poor	Lighting 19.3 Reflection 22.3 Parallax 18.1 16% 19.9 fps	MRender 27.6 Gravity 19.3 Splatting 25.2 20% 24.1 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 17.1% Great: 55%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 156GB free Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 3945 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1175 (B1) Unknown 99 99 8 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 61 31 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 69 (F1) Unknown 99 99 3604592507	63.7% Good	Read 268 Write 214 Mixed 219 52% 234 MB/s	4K Read 33.2 4K Write 56.3 4K Mixed 26.3 114% 38.6 MB/s	DQ Read 189 DQ Write 60.9 DQ Mixed 86.8 74% 112 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 63.7% Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 140GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 619 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 252 (B1) Unknown 99 99 2 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 59 30 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 31 (F1) Unknown 99 99 2414247087	70% Very good	Read 268 Write 214 Mixed 219 52% 234 MB/s	4K Read 32.5 4K Write 57.6 4K Mixed 36.1 126% 42.1 MB/s	DQ Read 169 DQ Write 153 DQ Mixed 87.9 86% 137 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 70% Great: 134%
Corsair Force GT 120GB-$155 13,464 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 55GB free Firmware: 5.05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 99 99 2679103 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 80 80 82145544521232 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1137 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 327 (B1) Unknown 0 0 2 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 22 65 47248900118 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 2679103 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 2679103 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 2679103 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 5645 (EA) Unknown 0 0 4121 (F1) Unknown 0 0 4121 (F2) Unknown 0 0 28431	53.1% Above average	Read 265 Write 142 Mixed 186 44% 198 MB/s	4K Read 27.4 4K Write 63.8 4K Mixed 14.9 94% 35.4 MB/s	DQ Read 142 DQ Write 148 DQ Mixed 35.2 57% 108 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 53.1% Great: 83%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$40 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 116 99 103084648 (03) Spinup time 91 91 0 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5753 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 49 49 463865910201 (09) Power-on hours count 90 90 8986 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2990 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 98 47245361163 (BD) vendor-specific 19 19 81 (BE) vendor-specific 72 53 471072796 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 299 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 5866 (C2) HDA temperature 28 47 42949672988 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 5420248733802 (F1) Unknown 100 253 83514400492 (F2) Unknown 100 253 47883414894	89.6% Excellent	Read 156 Write 157 Mixed 165 120% 159 MB/s	4K Read 0.41 4K Write 1.19 4K Mixed 0.24 66% 0.61 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 89.6% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x4GB 106,178 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	49% Average	MC Read 18.6 MC Write 16.1 MC Mixed 15.1 47% 16.6 GB/s	SC Read 12.4 SC Write 12.2 SC Mixed 13.8 37% 12.8 GB/s	Latency 54.2 74% 54.2 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 49% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-P55M-UD4 Builds (Compare 43 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-P55M-UD4

CPU
Core i5-750Intel $72Bench 62%, 43,796 samples	23x
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	9x
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	7x

GPU
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	3x
HD 5770AMDBench 10%, 37,602 samples	3x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	3x

SSD
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	3x
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $95Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	3x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	2x

RAM
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	10x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	10x
12GBUnknownBench 35%, 85,415 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 61% - Good

Total price: $110

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16