Asrock Z87 Extreme4

Performance Results


Gaming 82% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 64% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	90.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	76.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asrock Z87 Extreme4 (all builds)
Memory	12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130703
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Aug 20 '17 at 23:30
Run Duration	154 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4670K-$62 128,482 User benchmarks, average bench 68% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	89.6% Excellent	Memory 94.5 1-Core 120 2-Core 246 87% 154 Pts	4-Core 488 8-Core 494 66% 491 Pts	64-Core 489 30% 489 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 89.6% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560 214,030 User benchmarks, average bench 79% MSI(1462 3232) CLim: 1635 MHz, MLim: 1953 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 385.28 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	90.6% Outstanding	Lighting 117 Reflection 126 Parallax 115 95% 119 fps	MRender 106 Gravity 109 Splatting 89.3 82% 101 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 90.6% Great: 87%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 830 256GB-$261 25,763 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 49GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXM03B1Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 99 99 4096 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 13935 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 2785 (B1) Unknown 89 89 374 (B3) Unknown 99 99 2 (B5) Unknown 99 99 1 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 99 99 1 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 73 50 27 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 253 253 1 (EB) Unknown 99 99 66 (F1) Unknown 99 99 40805336193	76.1% Very good	Read 504 Write 281 Mixed 345 83% 376 MB/s	4K Read 24.1 4K Write 69.6 4K Mixed 21.2 100% 38.3 MB/s	DQ Read 294 DQ Write 103 DQ Mixed 59.4 80% 152 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 76.1% Great: 86%
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150 68,337 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 25GB free Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 7045 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1631 (B1) Unknown 98 98 22 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 75 59 25 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 52 (F1) Unknown 99 99 18443865917	97.1% Outstanding	Read 505 Write 267 Mixed 359 83% 377 MB/s	4K Read 47.4 4K Write 88.7 4K Mixed 31.1 159% 55.7 MB/s	DQ Read 374 DQ Write 244 DQ Mixed 97.8 130% 239 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 97.1% Great: 126%
Seagate ST32000641AS 2TB-$174 8,506 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 630GB free Firmware: CC13 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 99 152151371 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5884 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 72 60 15148199 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 4298 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3254 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 98 51540393998 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 75 52 538312729 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 448 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 97 97 10607 (C2) HDA temperature 25 48 51539607577 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 30 24 152151371 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -880468281416 (F1) Unknown 100 253 2676677317 (F2) Unknown 100 253 23429866	54.3% Above average	Read 99.4 Write 90.1 Mixed 94.6 71% 94.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.42 4K Write 0.57 4K Mixed 0.43 76% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 54.3% Great: 73%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ares DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB 4,003 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	62.3% Good	MC Read 21.7 MC Write 22.6 MC Mixed 19.1 60% 21.1 GB/s	SC Read 16.8 SC Write 22.6 SC Mixed 20.6 57% 20 GB/s	Latency 58.4 68% 58.4 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 62.3% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z87 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 921 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock Z87 Extreme4 - $224

CPU
Core i5-4670KIntel $62Bench 68%, 128,482 samples	273x
Core i7-4770KIntel $120Bench 74%, 172,887 samples	244x
Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples	114x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	67x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	60x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	59x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	37x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	29x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	28x

RAM
BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GBCrucialBench 55%, 48,796 samples	29x
TridentX DDR3 2400 C10 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 67%, 24,592 samples	23x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	22x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $431

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16