PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
Graphics | 17.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 42.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asus P7H55-M (all builds) |
Memory | 3.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20110425 |
Uptime | 0.4 Days |
Run Date | Aug 28 '17 at 17:39 |
Run Duration | 281 Seconds |
Run User | AUS-User |
Background CPU | 90% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
31.8%
Below average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-$104
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 385.28
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
17.5%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89
166GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3FD6SD Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
42.2%
Average
|
|||
46.2%
Average
|
||||
Seagate Expansion 4TB
2TB free, PID 231a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
|
18.8%
Very poor
|
|||
WD My Book 1140 2TB
1TB free, PID 1140
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
|
14.2%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB
|
20.3%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples | 94x |
Core i3 540Intel $90Bench 46%, 24,563 samples | 71x |
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples | 59x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 32x |
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 18x |
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples | 17x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 85% - Excellent | Total price: $187 |