Asrock Z77 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics26.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock Z77 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130711
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateSep 09 '17 at 07:30
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2700K-$89
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
87.8% Excellent
Memory 93.9
1-Core 119
2-Core 234
85% 149 Pts
4-Core 446
8-Core 606
67% 526 Pts
64-Core 606
38% 606 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-Ti-$362
Asus(1043 841F) 2GB
CLim: 1254 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 385.41
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
26.7% Poor
Lighting 31.7
Reflection 34.5
Parallax 39.7
26% 35.3 fps
MRender 40.7
Gravity 37.1
Splatting 29.2
28% 35.7 fps
Poor: 23%
This bench: 26.7%
Great: 29%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
133GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 517
Write 414
Mixed 421
100% 451 MB/s
4K Read 35.3
4K Write 80.4
4K Mixed 40.2
148% 52 MB/s
DQ Read 340
DQ Write 212
DQ Mixed 125
134% 226 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 104%
Great: 134%
Samsung 830 128GB-$109
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM03B1Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Read 489
Write 165
Mixed 181
60% 278 MB/s
4K Read 18.9
4K Write 43.2
4K Mixed 16.8
73% 26.3 MB/s
DQ Read 258
DQ Write 70.6
DQ Mixed 53.5
68% 127 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 76%
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40
124GB free
Firmware: CR100-13 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
27.4% Poor
Read 43.6
Write 51.8
Mixed 44
35% 46.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.53
4K Write 1.14
4K Mixed 0.35
82% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 27.4%
Great: 44%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320GB-$80
92GB free
Firmware: 3.AAD Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
25.9% Poor
Read 45.4
Write 44.4
Mixed 43.7
34% 44.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.66
4K Write 1.14
4K Mixed 0.31
83% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 25.9%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
58.9% Above average
MC Read 20.5
MC Write 20.8
MC Mixed 18.4
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 21.1
SC Mixed 18.7
54% 19 GB/s
Latency 60
67% 60 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 3,999 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 - $165

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $581
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback