Asrock X399 Taichi

Performance Results


Gaming 79% Battleship	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 102% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	113% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock X399 Taichi (all builds)
Memory	12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170905
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 11 '17 at 15:45
Run Duration	225 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	40%

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$225 23,641 User benchmarks, average bench 77% SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	66.1% Good	Memory 64.9 1-Core 109 2-Core 167 65% 114 Pts	4-Core 362 8-Core 652 61% 507 Pts	64-Core 2,383 148% 2,383 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 66.1% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Titan X Pascal-$286 8,692 User benchmarks, average bench 121% Nvidia(10DE 119A) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 385.41 Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	113% Outstanding	Lighting 146 Reflection 162 Parallax 128 119% 145 fps	MRender 123 Gravity 164 Splatting 122 111% 136 fps
Poor: 108% ↑ This bench: 113% Great: 132%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HP S700 120GB-$30 4,522 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 100GB free Firmware: Q0330B1 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 25 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 39 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 3 (AE) Unknown 100 100 33 (B0) Unknown 100 100 100 (B7) Unknown 100 100 2 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 35 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 8685 (F2) Unknown 100 100 474 (F3) Unknown 100 100 8127	31.4% Below average	Read 2.66 Write 294 Mixed 45.1 26% 114 MB/s	4K Read 1.34 4K Write 60.8 4K Mixed 1.67 36% 21.3 MB/s	DQ Read 11 DQ Write 139 DQ Mixed 1.94 23% 50.5 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 31.4% Great: 95%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 876GB free (System drive) Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 179 170 2016 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 930 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 77 77 17010 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 849 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 40 81605623881 (BE) vendor-specific 70 55 505085982 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 504 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 425 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	69.9% Good	Read 129 Write 115 Mixed 97.1 85% 114 MB/s	4K Read 0.29 4K Write 0.42 4K Mixed 0.22 45% 0.31 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 69.9% Great: 109%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$80 75,644 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 684GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 196 182 7183 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2855 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 91 91 6939 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 157 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 106 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 197 197 9223 (C2) HDA temperature 124 108 28 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	61.2% Good	Read 113 Write 100 Mixed 86.9 75% 100 MB/s	4K Read 0.65 4K Write 1.42 4K Mixed 0.2 76% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 61.2% Great: 96%
Seagate ST2000VM003-1CT164 2TB 16,094 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 53GB free Firmware: ES22 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 105 99 7604720 (03) Spinup time 96 95 0 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3273 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 67 60 6121144 (09) Power-on hours count 85 85 13299 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 276 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 1 4295099747 (BD) vendor-specific 86 86 14 (BE) vendor-specific 73 57 454557723 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 195 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 3276 (C2) HDA temperature 27 43 60129542171 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 1 15055	62.3% Good	Read 104 Write 113 Mixed 87.4 76% 102 MB/s	4K Read 0.53 4K Write 0.99 4K Mixed 0.13 55% 0.55 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 62.3% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 16GB 23 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 2134, 2134, 2134, 2134 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	124% Outstanding	MC Read 40.8 MC Write 57.5 MC Mixed 48.7 140% 49 GB/s	SC Read 15.1 SC Write 31.3 SC Mixed 21.7 65% 22.7 GB/s	Latency 114 35% 114 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 124% Great: 91%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X399 Taichi Builds (Compare 561 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 99%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 120%

UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X399 Taichi

CPU
Ryzen TR 1950XAMD $225Bench 77%, 23,641 samples	155x
Ryzen TR 1920XAMD $800Bench 78%, 10,440 samples	114x
Ryzen TR 2950XAMD $1,075Bench 81%, 10,169 samples	103x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	47x
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,375Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	36x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	27x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	38x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	28x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	19x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	13x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 89%, 92,468 samples	12x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GBG.SKILL $139Bench 95%, 14,506 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Excellent

Total price: $913

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16