Asus H110M-C

Performance Results


Gaming 43% Speed boat	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 34% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	58.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	46.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus H110M-C (all builds)
Memory	3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160518
Uptime	2.4 Days
Run Date	Sep 12 '17 at 03:09
Run Duration	226 Seconds
Run User	CHL-User
Background CPU	36%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6400-$79 171,457 User benchmarks, average bench 61% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	67.5% Good	Memory 88.6 1-Core 85.8 2-Core 180 69% 118 Pts	4-Core 266 8-Core 290 37% 278 Pts	64-Core 356 22% 356 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 67.5% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Asus(1043 85A4) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 385.28 Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	58.2% Above average	Lighting 74.2 Reflection 73.2 Parallax 69.8 60% 72.4 fps	MRender 66.3 Gravity 63.8 Splatting 66.9 54% 65.7 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 58.2% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89 105,079 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 136GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3J96R9 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 1 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2197 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 514 (64) Unknown 100 100 2370912 (65) Unknown 100 100 281184 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 45 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 99 99 698 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 1340 (B7) Unknown 99 99 6 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 28 100 154619674652 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 1 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 100 100 1 (E7) Temperature 99 99 1 (E9) Unknown 100 100 4132 (EA) Unknown 100 100 1389 (F1) Unknown 100 100 2917 (F2) Unknown 100 100 4882 (FA) Read error retry rate 100 100 1	46.7% Average	Read 453 Write 234 Mixed 249 69% 312 MB/s	4K Read 18.7 4K Write 22.6 4K Mixed 5.66 48% 15.6 MB/s	DQ Read 19 DQ Write 19.1 DQ Mixed 5.36 8% 14.5 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 46.7% Great: 88%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 701GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 170 166 2458 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 295 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1385 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 295 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 14 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1689 (C2) HDA temperature 113 108 30 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	104% Outstanding	Read 180 Write 181 Mixed 158 130% 173 MB/s	4K Read 1.03 4K Write 2.35 4K Mixed 0.34 124% 1.24 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 109%
Hitachi HTS543232A7A384 320GB-$40 17,642 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 129GB free Firmware: ES2OA60W Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (85^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 214 214 60129542145 (04) Start/Stop count 88 88 19555 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 88 88 5308 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 3627 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 253 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 88 88 128012 (C2) HDA temperature 222 222 201863921691 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0	40.9% Average	Read 67 Write 75.7 Mixed 78.8 56% 73.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.31 4K Write 1.03 4K Mixed 0.2 54% 0.51 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 40.9% Great: 46%
Fujitsu MHZ2160BH G2 160GB-$80 1,995 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 84GB free Firmware: 8909 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 167888 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 27262976 (03) Spinup time 100 100 1 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 5089 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 8585639690241 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 789 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 77 77 11870 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 253 253 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 5037 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 253 253 0 (B9) Unknown 253 253 0 (BA) Unknown 253 253 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 94 -6309306892280 (BC) Unknown 100 99 2 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 73 42 488112155 (BF) G-sense error rate 253 99 16580613 (C0) Power-off retract count 96 96 69207072 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 93 93 156320 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 1380 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 13337231361 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 253 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 1184 (CB) Run out cancel 100 100 1533156390810 (F0) Head flying hours 200 200 0	31.1% Below average	Read 52.4 Write 55.7 Mixed 55.2 41% 54.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.32 4K Write 1.48 4K Mixed 0.36 81% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 31.1% Great: 34%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2400 C15 2x4GB 38,955 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	65.4% Good	MC Read 23.6 MC Write 26.8 MC Mixed 20.5 68% 23.6 GB/s	SC Read 8.9 SC Write 22.2 SC Mixed 17.8 47% 16.3 GB/s	Latency 68.9 58% 68.9 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 65.4% Great: 91%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110M-C Builds (Compare 1,039 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 24%

Surfboard

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H110M-C

CPU
Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	176x
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	146x
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	116x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	98x
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	89x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	68x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	41x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	29x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	26x

RAM
HyperX 2133 C14 2x8GBKingstonBench 68%, 49,673 samples	18x
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x4GBHyperX $67Bench 69%, 46,617 samples	18x
HyperX 2133 C14 1x8GBKingstonBench 37%, 30,824 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $166

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16