MSI X370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A32)

Performance Results


Gaming 102% UFO	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 95% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	113% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	183% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Micro-Star MS-7A32
Motherboard	MSI X370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A32) (all builds)
Memory	12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170815
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 17 '17 at 20:57
Run Duration	197 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X-$125 140,440 User benchmarks, average bench 74% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	86.9% Excellent	Memory 84.2 1-Core 122 2-Core 243 83% 150 Pts	4-Core 481 8-Core 796 78% 638 Pts	64-Core 1,011 63% 1,011 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 86.9% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Asus(1043 85E4) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 385.41 Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	113% Outstanding	Lighting 142 Reflection 198 Parallax 175 116% 172 fps	MRender 132 Gravity 179 Splatting 125 118% 145 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 113% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 179GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	183% Outstanding	Read 1,671 Write 1,030 Mixed 1,141 283% 1,281 MB/s	4K Read 47.1 4K Write 72.4 4K Mixed 36.2 156% 51.9 MB/s	DQ Read 167 DQ Write 122 DQ Mixed 62.3 69% 117 MB/s
Poor: 142% ↑ This bench: 183% Great: 236%
OCZ VERTEX2 180GB 189 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 133GB free Firmware: 1.37 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 120 120 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 -137670881689875 (0C) Power cycle count 92 92 8955 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 705 (B1) Unknown 0 0 2 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 30 30 128850984990 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 5696 (EA) Unknown 0 0 2432 (F1) Unknown 0 0 2432 (F2) Unknown 0 0 12608	36.3% Below average	Read 170 Write 70.2 Mixed 89 24% 110 MB/s	4K Read 16.2 4K Write 46.2 4K Mixed 13.6 66% 25.3 MB/s	DQ Read 146 DQ Write 100 DQ Mixed 39.8 52% 95.2 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 36.3% Great: 48%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$139 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 125GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1509 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1303 (B1) Unknown 99 99 5 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 44 32 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 12 12 88733 (EB) Unknown 99 99 510 (F1) Unknown 99 99 8296610839	94.5% Outstanding	Read 508 Write 404 Mixed 420 99% 444 MB/s	4K Read 38 4K Write 60.8 4K Mixed 40 141% 46.2 MB/s	DQ Read 150 DQ Write 116 DQ Mixed 60.1 65% 109 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 94.5% Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80 69,224 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 20GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1347 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1421 (B1) Unknown 99 99 18 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 47 35 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 16 (EB) Unknown 99 99 251 (F1) Unknown 99 99 4050968942	92.9% Outstanding	Read 520 Write 401 Mixed 422 100% 447 MB/s	4K Read 38 4K Write 61 4K Mixed 35.8 136% 44.9 MB/s	DQ Read 152 DQ Write 119 DQ Mixed 59.6 65% 110 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 92.9% Great: 115%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$40 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 913GB free Firmware: MX4OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 139 139 72 (03) Spinup time 162 162 21490106602 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 4483 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 7786 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 4373 (C0) Power-off retract count 97 97 4483 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 97 97 4483 (C2) HDA temperature 181 181 227634446369 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	82.3% Excellent	Read 147 Write 140 Mixed 152 111% 146 MB/s	4K Read 0.61 4K Write 1.68 4K Mixed 0.2 79% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 82.3% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GB 9,254 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	MC Read 43.6 MC Write 38.7 MC Mixed 34.3 111% 38.9 GB/s	SC Read 25.6 SC Write 43 SC Mixed 28.8 93% 32.5 GB/s	Latency 73 55% 73 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 117%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A32) Builds (Compare 1,813 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 78%

Battleship

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 76%

Battleship

Motherboard: MSI X370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A32) - $155

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	250x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	225x
Ryzen 5 1600XAMD $125Bench 74%, 140,440 samples	180x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	174x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	121x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	115x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $76Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	54x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	53x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	52x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	89x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	73x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $41Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	58x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 79% - Very good

Total price: $899

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $131	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16