Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 30% Raft	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 25% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	36% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	28.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20160504
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 21 '17 at 00:59
Run Duration	317 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.4 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	72.7% Very good	Memory 91.9 1-Core 75.7 2-Core 153 65% 107 Pts	4-Core 290 8-Core 480 47% 385 Pts	64-Core 478 30% 478 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 72.7% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 3733) CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 384.76 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	36% Below average	Lighting 46.9 Reflection 31 Parallax 39.1 38% 39 fps	MRender 38.8 Gravity 41.7 Splatting 36.2 32% 38.9 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 36% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 459GB free Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1269 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 68 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 60 33 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 1 (EB) Unknown 99 99 17 (F1) Unknown 99 99 832921371	107% Outstanding	Read 512 Write 387 Mixed 412 97% 437 MB/s	4K Read 43.7 4K Write 82.5 4K Mixed 46.2 169% 57.5 MB/s	DQ Read 278 DQ Write 203 DQ Mixed 121 123% 201 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 134%
Sandisk Ultra II 500GB 3,299 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 364GB free Firmware: X411 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 705 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 51 (A5) Unknown 100 100 1376269 (A6) Unknown 100 100 0 (A7) Unknown 100 100 26 (A8) Unknown 100 100 1 (A9) Unknown 100 100 298 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 1 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 68 35 150325428256 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 12884901891 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 127 (EA) Unknown 100 100 143 (F1) Unknown 253 253 140 (F2) Unknown 253 253 113 (F4) Unknown 0 100 0	91.3% Outstanding	Read 428 Write 364 Mixed 284 80% 359 MB/s	4K Read 34 4K Write 94.4 4K Mixed 27.7 137% 52 MB/s	DQ Read 270 DQ Write 239 DQ Mixed 58.5 98% 189 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 91.3% Great: 109%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 229GB free Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 9178 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 481 (B1) Unknown 99 99 5 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 57 30 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 80 80 19605 (EB) Unknown 99 99 37 (F1) Unknown 99 99 1724906171	106% Outstanding	Read 517 Write 388 Mixed 411 98% 439 MB/s	4K Read 43.2 4K Write 78.7 4K Mixed 45.3 165% 55.8 MB/s	DQ Read 279 DQ Write 203 DQ Mixed 118 121% 200 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 134%
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$26 133,640 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 191GB free Firmware: Z331 Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	74.3% Very good	Read 499 Write 349 Mixed 374 90% 408 MB/s	4K Read 25 4K Write 71.3 4K Mixed 7.51 85% 34.6 MB/s	DQ Read 190 DQ Write 224 DQ Mixed 6.34 60% 140 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 74.3% Great: 86%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 183GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 11038 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 479 (B1) Unknown 99 99 17 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 53 34 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 84 84 15363 (EB) Unknown 99 99 68 (F1) Unknown 99 99 23447461879	106% Outstanding	Read 515 Write 388 Mixed 410 97% 438 MB/s	4K Read 43.1 4K Write 79.6 4K Mixed 45.7 166% 56.1 MB/s	DQ Read 279 DQ Write 204 DQ Mixed 119 122% 201 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 134%
WD Black 4TB (2013)-$178 20,205 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 2.5TB free Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 154 150 11283 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3097 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 82 82 13387 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 527 (10) Unknown 3 197 54771951437 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 91 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 3005 (C2) HDA temperature 116 107 36 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	97.2% Outstanding	Read 196 Write 143 Mixed 142 120% 160 MB/s	4K Read 0.58 4K Write 3.33 4K Mixed 0.24 112% 1.38 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 97.2% Great: 98%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85 124,615 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 1.5TB free Firmware: 80.0 Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	95.8% Outstanding	Read 170 Write 164 Mixed 142 119% 159 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.06 4K Mixed 0.26 88% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 95.8% Great: 101%
WD Black 4TB (2013)-$178 20,205 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 1TB free Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 147 139 11625 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2231 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 82 82 13618 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 540 (10) Unknown 5 195 93360279795 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 91 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 2139 (C2) HDA temperature 117 104 35 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	80.3% Excellent	Read 163 Write 117 Mixed 115 98% 132 MB/s	4K Read 0.62 4K Write 2.74 4K Mixed 0.23 102% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 80.3% Great: 98%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85 124,615 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 1TB free Firmware: 80.0 Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	56% Above average	Read 100 Write 95 Mixed 96 73% 97 MB/s	4K Read 0.62 4K Write 1.99 4K Mixed 0.27 93% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 56% Great: 101%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136 31,988 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 170GB free Firmware: 80.0 Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	39.7% Below average	Read 69.5 Write 68.4 Mixed 72 53% 70 MB/s	4K Read 0.79 4K Write 2.08 4K Mixed 0.25 99% 1.04 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 39.7% Great: 87%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 4x8GB 8,984 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	49.9% Average	MC Read 19.8 MC Write 16.2 MC Mixed 17.5 51% 17.8 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 8.9 SC Mixed 12.2 30% 10.5 GB/s	Latency 64.2 62% 64.2 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 49.9% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,669 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 - $200

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	863x
FX-9590AMD $298Bench 63%, 26,109 samples	208x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	145x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	110x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	83x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	81x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	62x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	61x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	59x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	84x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GBKingstonBench 63%, 12,722 samples	45x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	28x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 53% - Above average

Total price: $630

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16