PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 45% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 55.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
Motherboard | Asus P8P67 REV 3.1 (all builds) |
Memory | 12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 8.1 |
BIOS Date | 20110328 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Sep 22 '17 at 08:55 |
Run Duration | 160 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 20% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
|
71.7%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 385.28
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
45%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
102%
Outstanding
|
||||
56.2%
Above average
|
||||
55.7%
Above average
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
45.7%
Average
|
||||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples | 160x |
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples | 122x |
Core i7-2600Intel $197Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 74x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 48x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 44x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 37x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 59% - Above average | Total price: $498 |