HP Z400 Workstation

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.26% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	37.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Z400 Workstation (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 0B4Ch
Memory	10.7 GB free of 12.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110610
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 27 '17 at 18:18
Run Duration	252 Seconds
Run User	FIN-User
Background CPU	41%

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon W3550 7,649 User benchmarks, average bench 66% CPU0 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.05 GHz Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	63.6% Good	Memory 84.4 1-Core 76.6 2-Core 150 62% 104 Pts	4-Core 250 8-Core 249 33% 249 Pts	64-Core 291 18% 291 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 63.6% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 600 15,964 User benchmarks, average bench 3% HP(103C 0835) 1GB CLim: 640 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 368.86 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	3.26% Terrible	Lighting 4 Reflection 4.54 Parallax 3.56 3% 4.03 fps	MRender 5.52 Gravity 4.13 Splatting 2.83 3% 4.16 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.26% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX 3K 240GB-$70 27,495 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 81GB free (System drive) Firmware: 580ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 5948442 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 -88373247081286 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 195 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 10 (B1) Unknown 0 0 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 26 30 73016410138 (C2) HDA temperature 26 30 73016410138 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 5948442 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 5948442 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 5948442 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 4294967296 (E9) Unknown 0 0 2014 (EA) Unknown 0 0 1908 (F1) Unknown 0 0 1908 (F2) Unknown 0 0 4213	37.9% Below average	Read 187 Write 169 Mixed 159 38% 172 MB/s	4K Read 15.6 4K Write 39.8 4K Mixed 12.7 61% 22.7 MB/s	DQ Read 29.8 DQ Write 56.5 DQ Mixed 12.8 18% 33 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 37.9% Great: 94%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 858GB free Firmware: HP63 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 105 99 9427222 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1390 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 79 60 98917229 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 5056 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 850 (B4) Unknown 100 100 327944443 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 61 538968096 (C2) HDA temperature 32 40 60129542176 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 43 27 9427222 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	53.1% Above average	Read 69.2 Write 116 Mixed 31.5 53% 72.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.78 4K Write 1.55 4K Mixed 0.5 117% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 53.1% Great: 68%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 32GB 23,482 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 23GB free, PID 5575 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	7.33% Terrible	Read 21.2 Write 5.85 Mixed 8.68 12% 11.9 MB/s	4K Read 3.93 4K Write 0.67 4K Mixed 0.93 69% 1.84 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 7.33% Great: 19%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:80 2C 18JSF25672AZ-1G4G1 ID:80 AD HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 ID:80 2C 18JSF25672AZ-1G4G1 ID:80 2C 18JSF25672AZ-1G4F1 ID:80 2C 18JSF25672AZ-1G4G1 ID:80 2C 18JSF25672AZ-1G4F1 46GB 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 34816 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	42.3% Average	MC Read 16 MC Write 12.3 MC Mixed 16.9 43% 15.1 GB/s	SC Read 8.6 SC Write 7.5 SC Mixed 10.7 26% 8.93 GB/s	Latency 72.7 55% 72.7 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z400 Workstation Builds (Compare 3,316 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: HP Z400 Workstation

CPU
Xeon W3520Intel $230Bench 63%, 6,508 samples	569x
Xeon W3550IntelBench 66%, 7,649 samples	534x
Xeon W3565IntelBench 67%, 7,121 samples	487x

GPU
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples	272x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	155x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	137x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	136x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	73x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	65x

RAM
ID:80 AD HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 42GBUnknownBench 37%, 128 samples	22x
ID:80 AD HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 46GBUnknownBench 45%, 108 samples	18x
ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 46GBUnknownBench 46%, 280 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $258

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16