Asus RAMPAGE V EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics81.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive125% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE V EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory22.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161202
Uptime3.7 Days
Run DateOct 01 '17 at 10:42
Run Duration274 Seconds
Run User ARE-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6850K-$115
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
81.4% Excellent
Memory 87.5
1-Core 119
2-Core 233
82% 146 Pts
4-Core 406
8-Core 672
66% 539 Pts
64-Core 860
53% 860 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 385.28
Performing below potential (74th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
81.7% Excellent
Lighting 106
Reflection 108
Parallax 96.6
86% 104 fps
MRender 91
Gravity 95.2
Splatting 82.9
73% 89.7 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 530 Series 120GB-$79
56GB free
Firmware: DC32 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
57.1% Above average
Read 505
Write 138
Mixed 202
61% 282 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 68.5
4K Mixed 13.4
91% 35.6 MB/s
DQ Read 24.3
DQ Write 73.5
DQ Mixed 37.9
32% 45.2 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 79%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$37
44GB free
Firmware: 580ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
52.7% Above average
Read 502
Write 96
Mixed 157
54% 252 MB/s
4K Read 21.5
4K Write 71.8
4K Mixed 11.4
85% 34.9 MB/s
DQ Read 23.4
DQ Write 77.5
DQ Mixed 9.93
19% 36.9 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 73%
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$250
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
125% Outstanding
Read 1,221
Write 490
Mixed 786
183% 832 MB/s
4K Read 36.1
4K Write 89.1
4K Mixed 22.8
131% 49.4 MB/s
DQ Read 188
DQ Write 170
DQ Mixed 101
97% 153 MB/s
Poor: 131%
This bench: 125%
Great: 243%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
3TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
84.1% Excellent
Read 150
Write 143
Mixed 135
107% 142 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.54
4K Mixed 0.28
116% 1.24 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 83%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110
1TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
79.1% Very good
Read 149
Write 127
Mixed 116
98% 131 MB/s
4K Read 0.68
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.21
91% 1 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 100%
JetFlash Transcend 64GB
47GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
10.9% Very poor
Read 37.5
Write 9.33
Mixed 15.4
22% 20.8 MB/s
4K Read 4.56
4K Write 0.77
4K Mixed 0.37
56% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 10.9%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2400C15/16G Crucial BLS8G4D240FSE.16FBD Crucial BLS8G4D240FSE.16FBD 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
66.3% Good
MC Read 26.4
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 22
69% 24.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 19
SC Mixed 17.2
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 70
57% 70 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RAMPAGE V EXTREME Builds (Compare 2,055 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE V EXTREME - $122

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $941
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback