Asus P9X79 WS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics36.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P9X79 WS  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130423
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 04 '17 at 19:18
Run Duration267 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3930K-$280
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
82% Excellent
Memory 96.3
1-Core 109
2-Core 193
79% 133 Pts
4-Core 384
8-Core 431
53% 408 Pts
64-Core 513
32% 513 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 82%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 385.69
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
36.4% Below average
Lighting 47.5
Reflection 45.6
Parallax 40.7
39% 44.6 fps
MRender 39.5
Gravity 40.9
Splatting 36.8
32% 39.1 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$40
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC4B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
58.5% Above average
Read 103
Write 101
Mixed 91.4
74% 98.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.67
4K Write 1.01
4K Mixed 0.3
80% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 113%
WD WD2001FASS-00U0B0 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 1D05 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
76.8% Very good
Read 158
Write 109
Mixed 123
98% 130 MB/s
4K Read 0.64
4K Write 2.51
4K Mixed 0.44
122% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 83%
WD Black 4TB (2013)-$178
916GB free
Firmware: 1A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
70.9% Very good
Read 128
Write 119
Mixed 122
93% 123 MB/s
4K Read 1.05
4K Write 2.83
4K Mixed 0.28
127% 1.39 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 98%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1.5TB-$88
510GB free
Firmware: CCH4 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
53% Above average
Read 99.1
Write 85.8
Mixed 89.8
69% 91.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.43
4K Write 1.16
4K Mixed 0.28
71% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 53%
Great: 70%
Hitachi HUA723020ALA641 2TB-$78
337GB free (System drive)
Firmware: A840 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
50.2% Above average
Read 88.7
Write 86.2
Mixed 72.4
62% 82.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.38
4K Mixed 0.14
49% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 82%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$52
157GB free
Firmware: CC52 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
53.3% Above average
Read 95.1
Write 90.7
Mixed 85.3
68% 90.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.69
4K Write 0.87
4K Mixed 0.15
61% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 96%
Seagate NAS HDD 4TB-$145
110GB free
Firmware: SC46 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
46.5% Average
Read 79.2
Write 82.6
Mixed 74.5
59% 78.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.58
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.12
66% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsZ DDR3 2133 C9 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
118% Outstanding
MC Read 48.9
MC Write 47.7
MC Mixed 43.1
133% 46.6 GB/s
SC Read 18.6
SC Write 15.1
SC Mixed 14.6
46% 16.1 GB/s
Latency 52.9
76% 52.9 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 118%
Great: 121%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P9X79 WS Builds (Compare 426 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus P9X79 WS - $270

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $782
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback