Aftershock P95_HP,HR,HQ

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics4.73% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive91.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemAftershock P95_HP,HR,HQ  (all builds)
MotherboardAftershock P95_HP,HR,HQ
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170410
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateOct 20 '17 at 19:45
Run Duration86 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
80.8% Excellent
Memory 90.1
1-Core 110
2-Core 207
78% 136 Pts
4-Core 386
8-Core 594
61% 490 Pts
64-Core 592
37% 592 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
Clevo(1558 9501) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64 Ver. 22.20.16.4749
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
4.73% Terrible
Lighting 4.8
Reflection 69.2
Parallax 4.66
4% 26.2 fps
MRender 7.67
Gravity 4.53
Splatting 10
6% 7.41 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.73%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO M.2 500GB
152GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT21B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
91.1% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 396
Mixed 406
97% 436 MB/s
4K Read 42.2
4K Write 80.1
4K Mixed 25.8
139% 49.3 MB/s
DQ Read 43.8
DQ Write 209
DQ Mixed 25.6
49% 92.9 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 91.1%
Great: 131%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
75.4% Very good
MC Read 29.2
MC Write 29.2
MC Mixed 22.2
77% 26.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 27.5
SC Mixed 22.8
62% 21.7 GB/s
Latency 67.1
60% 67.1 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback