Gigabyte GA-X299 UD4-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 21% Surfboard	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	23.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Gigabyte X299 UD4
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X299 UD4-CF (all builds)
Memory	13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170808
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 31 '17 at 17:38
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7820X-$375 28,524 User benchmarks, average bench 80% CPU0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	89% Excellent	Memory 80.6 1-Core 141 2-Core 284 91% 168 Pts	4-Core 521 8-Core 1,008 91% 765 Pts	64-Core 1,427 88% 1,427 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 89% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M2000 5,678 User benchmarks, average bench 21% Nvidia(10DE 1190) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1228 MHz, MLim: 1651 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 385.69 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	23.4% Poor	Lighting 29.3 Reflection 30.7 Parallax 27.8 24% 29.3 fps	MRender 27 Gravity 28.1 Splatting 27.7 23% 27.6 fps
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 23.4% Great: 22%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Crucial BX100 500GB-$49 13,478 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 255GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU02 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1069 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1438 (A0) Unknown 100 100 0 (A1) Unknown 100 100 66 (A3) Unknown 100 100 25 (A4) Unknown 100 100 71456 (A5) Unknown 100 100 116 (A6) Unknown 100 100 18 (A7) Unknown 100 100 68 (A8) Unknown 100 100 2000 (A9) Unknown 100 100 100 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 100 100 55 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 86 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 29 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 477666 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 2 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (F1) Unknown 100 100 781094 (F2) Unknown 100 100 432016 (F5) Unknown 100 100 1143296
Poor: 67% Great: 108%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA662 500GB 14,997 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 359GB free Firmware: JP2OA50E Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 136 136 93 (03) Spinup time 121 121 12897222848 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 9576 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 138 138 31 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 11482 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 3208 (C0) Power-off retract count 93 93 9599 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 93 93 9599 (C2) HDA temperature 206 206 279173988381 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	54.5% Above average	Read 112 Write 77.7 Mixed 88.8 70% 92.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.62 4K Write 1.33 4K Mixed 0.3 84% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 54.5% Great: 76%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA662 500GB 14,997 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 314GB free Firmware: JP2OA50E Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 135 135 97 (03) Spinup time 119 119 12897484993 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 4179 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 130 130 35 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 11675 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 3208 (C0) Power-off retract count 97 97 4194 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 97 97 4194 (C2) HDA temperature 200 200 266289086494 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	68.7% Good	Read 126 Write 114 Mixed 107 87% 116 MB/s	4K Read 0.45 4K Write 1.35 4K Mixed 0.36 84% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 68.7% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 3000 C15 1x16GB 4,112 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 3000 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	36.5% Below average	MC Read 11.1 MC Write 15 MC Mixed 9.4 34% 11.8 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 17.7 SC Mixed 9.9 36% 12.7 GB/s	Latency 79.4 50% 79.4 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 36.5% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X299 UD4-CF Builds (Compare 156 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 99%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 83%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 93%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X299 UD4-CF

CPU
Core i7-7800XIntel $216Bench 78%, 22,334 samples	47x
Core i7-7820XIntel $375Bench 80%, 28,524 samples	38x
Core i9-7900XIntel $455Bench 82%, 19,432 samples	29x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	28x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	13x
GTX 1070-TiNvidia $299Bench 94%, 412,133 samples	9x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	9x
Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBWD $74Bench 228%, 180,890 samples	6x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	6x

RAM
2x16GBUnknownBench 91%, 46,387 samples	26x
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	24x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	18x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 61% - Good

Total price: $810

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16