PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 22.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 44.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
Motherboard | Asus P8B75-M LX (all builds) |
Memory | 4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit couleurs |
OS | Windows 8.1 |
BIOS Date | 20121010 |
Uptime | 3.3 Days |
Run Date | Nov 07 '17 at 00:05 |
Run Duration | 122 Seconds |
Run User | FRA-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-3570
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 1.35 GHz (avg)
|
52.1%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD RX 460-$90
CLim: 1212 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.4.4
|
22.7%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 830 128GB-$109
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM03B1Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
44.8%
Average
|
|||
94.8%
Outstanding
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
HyperX Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
25.4%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 179x |
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 158x |
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples | 104x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 80x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 69x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 57x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 64% - Good | Total price: $325 |