Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 9

Performance Results


Gaming 127% UFO	Desktop 98% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 145% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	136% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	300% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 9 (all builds)
Memory	121.8 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit 色彩
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170914
Uptime	6.6 Days
Run Date	Nov 10 '17 at 18:33
Run Duration	176 Seconds
Run User	HKG-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-7900X-$462 19,432 User benchmarks, average bench 82% CPU0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	92.6% Outstanding	Memory 74.7 1-Core 149 2-Core 300 93% 174 Pts	4-Core 590 8-Core 1,168 104% 879 Pts	64-Core 2026 125% 2026 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 92.6% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Zotac(19DA 1471) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2800 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 385.69 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	136% Outstanding	Lighting 191 Reflection 203 Parallax 181 155% 192 fps	MRender 134 Gravity 192 Splatting 130 123% 152 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 136% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$249 18,356 User benchmarks, average bench 279% 772GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B6Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	300% Outstanding	Read 2,065 Write 1,918 Mixed 1,828 432% 1,937 MB/s	4K Read 46.4 4K Write 170 4K Mixed 61.2 239% 92.5 MB/s	DQ Read 643 DQ Write 612 DQ Mixed 299 315% 518 MB/s
Poor: 168% ↑ This bench: 300% Great: 363%
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$625 54,978 User benchmarks, average bench 223% 476GB free Firmware: 2B0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	273% Outstanding	Read 2,286 Write 1,420 Mixed 1,623 393% 1,776 MB/s	4K Read 45.2 4K Write 209 4K Mixed 49.8 243% 101 MB/s	DQ Read 586 DQ Write 419 DQ Mixed 235 248% 413 MB/s
Poor: 138% ↑ This bench: 273% Great: 283%
Adata XPG SX900 512GB-$189 1,547 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 395GB free Firmware: 5.8.2a Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 4681851 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 86 86 -107107894414648 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 960 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 152 (B1) Unknown 0 0 2 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 37 42 42952425509 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 4681851 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 4681851 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 4681851 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 26793 (EA) Unknown 0 0 31466 (F1) Unknown 0 0 31466 (F2) Unknown 0 0 43233	62.9% Good	Read 473 Write 245 Mixed 323 77% 347 MB/s	4K Read 26.2 4K Write 19.3 4K Mixed 18.2 73% 21.2 MB/s	DQ Read 209 DQ Write 100 DQ Mixed 63.1 71% 124 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 62.9% Great: 69%
Hitachi HUS726060ALE610 6TB 695 User benchmarks, average bench 101% 5TB free Firmware: APGNT7J0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 137 137 104 (03) Spinup time 135 135 38686556646 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 512 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 128 128 18 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3094 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 512 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 826 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 826 (C2) HDA temperature 133 133 236224249901 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	111% Outstanding	Read 205 Write 182 Mixed 189 144% 192 MB/s	4K Read 0.96 4K Write 1.47 4K Mixed 0.62 136% 1.02 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 123%
HGST Deskstar NAS 6TB-$250 974 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 2TB free Firmware: APGNT517 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 137 137 104 (03) Spinup time 131 131 42982572533 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1215 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 140 140 15 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 6492 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1213 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 1563 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 1563 (C2) HDA temperature 136 136 223339020332 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	97.5% Outstanding	Read 183 Write 157 Mixed 151 123% 164 MB/s	4K Read 0.64 4K Write 1.26 4K Mixed 0.54 110% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 97.5% Great: 120%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8x16GB 2,632 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 8 of 8 slots used 128GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (29^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	92.5% Outstanding	MC Read 30.1 MC Write 49.1 MC Mixed 30.8 105% 36.7 GB/s	SC Read 8 SC Write 23.2 SC Mixed 10.7 40% 14 GB/s	Latency 90.9 44% 90.9 ns
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 92.5% Great: 142%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 9 Builds (Compare 215 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 102%

UFO

Desktop 88%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 110%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 9 - $500

CPU
Core i9-7900XIntel $462Bench 82%, 19,432 samples	67x
Core i7-7820XIntel $375Bench 80%, 28,524 samples	58x
Core i9-7920XIntel $250Bench 82%, 5,430 samples	19x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	63x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	32x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	18x

SSD
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $139Bench 266%, 63,520 samples	21x
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $249Bench 279%, 18,356 samples	14x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	10x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	60x
4x16GBUnknownBench 98%, 9,153 samples	27x
2x16GBUnknownBench 91%, 46,387 samples	23x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $1,586

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16