PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 34.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 98% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 28GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 28GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
System | HP h8-1437c (all builds) |
Motherboard | PEGATRON 2AD5 |
Memory | 25.4 GB free of 28 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 8.1 |
BIOS Date | 20120828 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Nov 12 '17 at 02:10 |
Run Duration | 141 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 11% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
69.1%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
EVGA(3842 6256) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13
|
34.3%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
112%
Outstanding
|
||||
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
149GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
98%
Outstanding
|
|||
60.5%
Good
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
59.7%
Above average
|
||||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-3470Intel $69Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 26x |
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples | 3x |
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 1x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GeForce GT 620NvidiaBench 2%, 17,163 samples | 12x |
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 4x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 4x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 57% - Above average | Total price: $149 |