Asus P5Q-VM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics14.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive38.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P5Q-VM  (all builds)
Memory6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20080725
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateNov 17 '17 at 17:31
Run Duration217 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X3220-$99
LGA 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
38.4% Below average
Memory 64.6
1-Core 18.6
2-Core 37.2
30% 40.1 Pts
4-Core 74.1
8-Core 73
10% 73.6 Pts
64-Core 73.4
4% 73.4 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-Ti-$152
Gainward(10B0 11C6) 2GB
CLim: 928 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 385.69
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
14.7% Very poor
Lighting 17.6
Reflection 15.8
Parallax 23.3
14% 18.9 fps
MRender 21.7
Gravity 21.4
Splatting 15
15% 19.4 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
98GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
38.9% Below average
Read 181
Write 166
Mixed 161
38% 169 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 30
4K Mixed 13.1
69% 22.3 MB/s
DQ Read 24.8
DQ Write 31.6
DQ Mixed 12.8
14% 23.1 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 124%
Seagate Momentus 5400.6 2.5" 500GB-$16
103GB free
Firmware: 0002BSM1 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
39% Below average
Read 67.8
Write 68.1
Mixed 61.8
50% 65.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 1.24
4K Mixed 0.38
84% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 39%
Great: 43%
Toshiba MK5059GSXP 500GB-$50
154GB free
Firmware: GN001U Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
29.5% Poor
Read 54.7
Write 48.2
Mixed 8.86
27% 37.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 0.17
4K Mixed 0.14
38% 0.25 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 29.5%
Great: 44%
Toshiba MK5059GSXP 500GB-$50
110GB free
Firmware: GN001U Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
40.3% Average
Read 71.9
Write 68.9
Mixed 66.1
52% 69 MB/s
4K Read 0.41
4K Write 0.14
4K Mixed 0.17
38% 0.24 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
15.6% Very poor
MC Read 6.3
MC Write 3.8
MC Mixed 4.4
14% 4.83 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 4.4
13% 4.47 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5Q-VM Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5Q-VM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $311
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $183Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback