Asus TUF Z270 MARK 1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics89.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive114% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF Z270 MARK 1  (all builds)
Memory13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.5 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170723
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 18 '17 at 14:17
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$241
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
95.9% Outstanding
Memory 96
1-Core 151
2-Core 298
100% 182 Pts
4-Core 515
8-Core 844
83% 679 Pts
64-Core 844
52% 844 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 95.9%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2052 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.31
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
89.6% Excellent
Lighting 116
Reflection 118
Parallax 108
94% 114 fps
MRender 95
Gravity 99.1
Splatting 99.5
80% 97.9 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
107GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 517
Write 404
Mixed 422
100% 448 MB/s
4K Read 44.4
4K Write 94.7
4K Mixed 46.6
177% 61.9 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 269
DQ Mixed 116
143% 255 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 114%
Great: 124%
Crucial MX300 SATA M.2 525GB-$140
89GB free
Firmware: M0CR060 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
86.2% Excellent
Read 489
Write 329
Mixed 339
85% 385 MB/s
4K Read 26.6
4K Write 77
4K Mixed 26.3
115% 43.3 MB/s
DQ Read 330
DQ Write 214
DQ Mixed 46.6
96% 197 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 98%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
72GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
96.5% Outstanding
Read 510
Write 347
Mixed 358
90% 405 MB/s
4K Read 44
4K Write 75.8
4K Mixed 26.5
141% 48.8 MB/s
DQ Read 370
DQ Write 236
DQ Mixed 85
122% 230 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 96.5%
Great: 118%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
107GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
79.7% Very good
Read 144
Write 134
Mixed 129
102% 135 MB/s
4K Read 0.84
4K Write 2.25
4K Mixed 0.35
116% 1.15 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2546 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
84.8% Excellent
MC Read 32
MC Write 32.6
MC Mixed 23.7
84% 29.4 GB/s
SC Read 19.8
SC Write 34.8
SC Mixed 26.5
77% 27 GB/s
Latency 54
74% 54 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z270 MARK 1 Builds (Compare 804 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 1 - $131

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $910
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback