PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
Graphics | 39.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 74.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus CROSSHAIR V FORMULA-Z (all builds) |
Memory | 5.6 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20140417 |
Uptime | 3.2 Days |
Run Date | Nov 18 '17 at 19:47 |
Run Duration | 119 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 87% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD FX-6200 Six-Core-$40
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
|
33.8%
Below average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1288 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.7.1
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
39.5%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
74.4%
Very good
|
||||
70.6%
Very good
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 8GBH2X04F1AA28-15 8GBH2X04F1AA28-15 F3-10666CL9-8GBXL 24GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192 MB
|
24.7%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 441x |
FX-9590AMD $298Bench 63%, 26,109 samples | 215x |
FX-8320AMD $175Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 67x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 58x |
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 48x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 45x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 57% - Above average | Total price: $630 |