Gigabyte GA-H77-D3H

Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 58% Gunboat	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	10.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	38.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H77-D3H (all builds)
Memory	27.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20120323
Uptime	6.2 Days
Run Date	Nov 21 '17 at 14:01
Run Duration	155 Seconds
Run User	TWN-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3450-$59 34,199 User benchmarks, average bench 66% Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3450 CPU @ 3.10GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	53.2% Above average	Memory 76.3 1-Core 67.2 2-Core 111 53% 84.9 Pts	4-Core 177 8-Core 172 23% 174 Pts	64-Core 176 11% 176 Pts
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 53.2% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 550-Ti-$250 54,392 User benchmarks, average bench 9% MSI(1462 2610) 1GB CLim: 950 MHz, MLim: 1075 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 385.69 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	10.3% Very poor	Lighting 11.6 Reflection 13.6 Parallax 9.84 10% 11.7 fps	MRender 16.3 Gravity 12 Splatting 15.6 12% 14.6 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 10.3% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 520 Series 240GB-$139 12,595 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 222GB free Firmware: 400i Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 0 0 -62328564478698 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 89 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 88 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 88 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 1316431 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 65535 (E3) Torque amplification count 100 100 2 (E4) Power-off retract count 100 100 65535 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 1316431 (F2) Unknown 100 100 35585 (F9) Unknown 100 100 42528	75.5% Very good	Read 513 Write 221 Mixed 281 74% 338 MB/s	4K Read 27.7 4K Write 63.7 4K Mixed 21.9 104% 37.7 MB/s	DQ Read 245 DQ Write 229 DQ Mixed 81.8 104% 185 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 75.5% Great: 95%
OCZ AGILITY3 60GB 14,293 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 13GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 62 62 162529903 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 47 47 -98612449068867 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 257 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 26 (B1) Unknown 0 0 12 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 30 30 128850984990 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 162529903 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 162529903 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 162529903 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 93 93 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 22226 (EA) Unknown 0 0 15873 (F1) Unknown 0 0 15873 (F2) Unknown 0 0 23532	38.8% Below average	Read 194 Write 59.3 Mixed 85.3 25% 113 MB/s	4K Read 23.3 4K Write 59.6 4K Mixed 13.4 84% 32.1 MB/s	DQ Read 77.1 DQ Write 59.5 DQ Mixed 20.9 28% 52.5 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 38.8% Great: 51%
Hitachi HDS721050DLE630 500GB 10,673 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 363GB free Firmware: MS1O Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 139 139 82 (03) Spinup time 126 126 12896764086 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 3514 (05) Reallocated sector count 87 87 373 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 115 115 34 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 47348 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 258 (C0) Power-off retract count 95 95 6017 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 95 95 6017 (C2) HDA temperature 153 153 253404053543 (C4) Reallocation count 76 76 600 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	82.1% Excellent	Read 148 Write 139 Mixed 146 109% 144 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.85 4K Mixed 0.2 82% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 82.1% Great: 82%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Transcend JM1600KLH-8G 4x8GB 157 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	47.2% Average	MC Read 16.3 MC Write 18.8 MC Mixed 15.2 48% 16.8 GB/s	SC Read 12.8 SC Write 12.9 SC Mixed 11.9 36% 12.5 GB/s	Latency 87.6 46% 87.6 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 47.2% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H77-D3H Builds (Compare 406 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H77-D3H

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	90x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	59x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	38x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	28x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	24x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	23x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	13x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	13x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	12x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	14x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	9x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBCorsairBench 54%, 43,127 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $436

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16