MSI Z270 KRAIT GAMING (MS-7A59)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 106%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics127% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive314% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7A59
MotherboardMSI Z270 KRAIT GAMING (MS-7A59)  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170627
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 23 '17 at 13:26
Run Duration236 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$241
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
95.5% Outstanding
Memory 97
1-Core 150
2-Core 289
99% 179 Pts
4-Core 506
8-Core 753
78% 630 Pts
64-Core 778
48% 778 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 95.5%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 388.31
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
127% Outstanding
Lighting 173
Reflection 212
Parallax 199
141% 195 fps
MRender 134
Gravity 179
Splatting 129
119% 147 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 127%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139
333GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
314% Outstanding
Read 2,379
Write 1,853
Mixed 1,616
432% 1,949 MB/s
4K Read 53.1
4K Write 175
4K Mixed 70.7
264% 99.7 MB/s
DQ Read 578
DQ Write 532
DQ Mixed 39.2
171% 383 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 314%
Great: 353%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
138GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 516
Write 409
Mixed 419
100% 448 MB/s
4K Read 49.2
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 48.8
196% 69.9 MB/s
DQ Read 353
DQ Write 282
DQ Mixed 122
144% 252 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 119%
Great: 134%
Kingston SSDNow V+200 240GB-$193
54GB free
Firmware: 502ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
78.1% Very good
Read 521
Write 160
Mixed 234
66% 305 MB/s
4K Read 36.5
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 14.7
141% 59.1 MB/s
DQ Read 183
DQ Write 165
DQ Mixed 52.5
73% 133 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 91%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$84
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
80.1% Excellent
Read 138
Write 141
Mixed 134
104% 138 MB/s
4K Read 0.95
4K Write 2.33
4K Mixed 0.21
106% 1.16 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 84%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
44.5% Average
Read 77.6
Write 77
Mixed 85.5
60% 80 MB/s
4K Read 0.51
4K Write 2.13
4K Mixed 0.41
106% 1.01 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 51%
Patriot Memory 32GB
29GB free, PID 5200
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
37.3% Below average
Read 178
Write 31.1
Mixed 36.3
75% 81.9 MB/s
4K Read 8.05
4K Write 0.91
4K Mixed 0.66
83% 3.21 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$42
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
105% Outstanding
MC Read 37.7
MC Write 41.1
MC Mixed 32.2
106% 37 GB/s
SC Read 22.4
SC Write 45.2
SC Mixed 31.5
94% 33 GB/s
Latency 50.4
79% 50.4 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 105%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z270 KRAIT GAMING (MS-7A59) Builds (Compare 703 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI Z270 KRAIT GAMING (MS-7A59) - $146

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $930
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $42SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback