Compaq-presario GQ526AA-ABE SR5245ES

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 7.14%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemCompaq-presario GQ526AA-ABE SR5245ES  (all builds)
MotherboardECS Nettle2
Memory1 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20070905
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 25 '17 at 19:28
Run Duration484 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4000+
Socket M2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
7.14% Terrible
Memory 4.9
1-Core 30
2-Core 56.7
15% 30.5 Pts
4-Core 53.6
8-Core 55.2
7% 54.4 Pts
64-Core 58.3
4% 58.3 Pts
Poor: 11%
This bench: 7.14%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 6150SE nForce 430
HP(103C 2A61) 128MB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 8.15.11.8593
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 0% Great: 0%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3250820AS 250GB-$50
216GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.CH
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
39.5% Below average
Read 72.9
Write 64.4
Mixed 65.5
51% 67.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.35
4K Write 1.52
4K Mixed 0.17
61% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 44%
USB DISK Pro 4GB
4GB free, PID 4223
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
2.99% Terrible
Read 11.9
Write 2.69
Mixed 3.91
6% 6.18 MB/s
4K Read 2.81
4K Write 0.005
4K Mixed 0.004
11% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.99%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 4 slots used
2GB DIMM
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
7.6% Terrible
MC Read 2.7
MC Write 2.8
MC Mixed 2.6
8% 2.7 GB/s
SC Read 1.5
SC Write 2.8
SC Mixed 1.1
5% 1.8 GB/s
Latency 454
9% 454 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.6%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback