Asus K30AD_M31AD_M51AD

Performance Results


Gaming 21% Surfboard	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	20.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Asus K30AD_M31AD_M51AD (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK K30AD_M31AD_M51AD_M32AD
Memory	13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20140402
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	Nov 25 '17 at 20:58
Run Duration	111 Seconds
Run User	FIN-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4460S 10,941 User benchmarks, average bench 66% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	74.9% Very good	Memory 90.5 1-Core 93.7 2-Core 180 72% 121 Pts	4-Core 344 8-Core 345 46% 344 Pts	64-Core 344 21% 344 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 74.9% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760 (192-bit) 10,656 User benchmarks, average bench 20% Asus(1043 8477) 3GB CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 385.69 Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	20.6% Poor	Lighting 23.8 Reflection 25.2 Parallax 29.3 19% 26.1 fps	MRender 34 Gravity 28.5 Splatting 23.3 23% 28.6 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 20.6% Great: 22%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 205GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 5558 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 2661 (B1) Unknown 99 99 20 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 99 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 47 35 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 106 (F1) Unknown 99 99 27746828279	102% Outstanding	Read 504 Write 402 Mixed 243 85% 383 MB/s	4K Read 44.4 4K Write 77.4 4K Mixed 36.4 155% 52.7 MB/s	DQ Read 274 DQ Write 196 DQ Mixed 106 114% 192 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 134%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$30 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 717GB free Firmware: MS2OA7L0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 141 141 73 (03) Spinup time 127 127 12896698548 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 3936 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 113 113 35 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 6111 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2982 (C0) Power-off retract count 97 97 3938 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 97 97 3938 (C2) HDA temperature 200 200 210454708254 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	66.7% Good	Read 129 Write 104 Mixed 75.3 76% 103 MB/s	4K Read 0.48 4K Write 1.78 4K Mixed 0.19 74% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 66.7% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 2x8GB 9,947 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	60.4% Good	MC Read 22 MC Write 22.7 MC Mixed 18.8 60% 21.2 GB/s	SC Read 15.3 SC Write 16.9 SC Mixed 19.2 49% 17.1 GB/s	Latency 66.5 60% 66.5 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 60.4% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical K30AD_M31AD_M51AD Builds (Compare 2,164 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 26%

Raft

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

System: Asus K30AD_M31AD_M51AD

CPU
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	413x
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	394x
Core i7-4790SIntel $60Bench 72%, 13,224 samples	350x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	162x
GTX 750Nvidia $120Bench 15%, 66,662 samples	155x
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	142x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	48x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	44x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	37x

RAM
M378B1G73DB0-CK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 55%, 9,947 samples	217x
M378B1G73DB0-CK0 M378B5173DB0-CK0 12GBSamsungBench 43%, 3,029 samples	214x
M378B1G73DB0-CK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 30%, 12,268 samples	111x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $324

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16