Asus Z10PE-D8 WS

Performance Results


Gaming 69% Battle cruiser	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 68% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	94.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	66.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Asus Z10PE-D8 WS (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK Z10PE-D8 WS
Memory	34.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170310
Uptime	10.2 Days
Run Date	Dec 01 '17 at 17:32
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	21%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 1,417 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	67.1% Good	Memory 82.3 1-Core 76.6 2-Core 146 61% 102 Pts	4-Core 280 8-Core 485 46% 382 Pts	64-Core 1,094 68% 1,094 Pts
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 67.1% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Asus(1043 85AA) CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2608 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 384.94 Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	94.7% Outstanding	Lighting 112 Reflection 131 Parallax 105 91% 116 fps	MRender 120 Gravity 142 Splatting 114 102% 125 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 94.7% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Microsoft Storage Space Device 9TB 7TB free Firmware: 0.1 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples

Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$190 68,849 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 7GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 99 99 1 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 12279 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 119 (B1) Unknown 96 96 198 (B3) Unknown 99 99 1 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 99 99 1 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 59 50 41 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 81 (F1) Unknown 99 99 97756561675	66.6% Good	Read 390 Write 99.7 Mixed 132 45% 207 MB/s	4K Read 32.6 4K Write 76.2 4K Mixed 26.4 124% 45.1 MB/s	DQ Read 269 DQ Write 90.5 DQ Mixed 61.8 76% 140 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 66.6% Great: 124%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 36ASF2G72PZ-2G1B1 4x16GB 132 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 4 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	113% Outstanding	MC Read 51.3 MC Write 42.6 MC Mixed 42.8 130% 45.6 GB/s	SC Read 10.8 SC Write 14.4 SC Mixed 18 41% 14.4 GB/s	Latency 76.3 52% 76.3 ns
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 113% Great: 124%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z10PE-D8 WS Builds (Compare 281 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 86%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 102%

UFO

System: Asus Z10PE-D8 WS

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v41stBench 65%, 987 samples	20x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v31stBench 63%, 2,624 samples	20x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v31stBench 64%, 1,710 samples	16x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	36x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	22x
GTX Titan XNvidia $615Bench 75%, 15,621 samples	19x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	13x
750 Series NVMe PCIe 400GBIntel $550Bench 186%, 8,641 samples	11x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $150Bench 336%, 200,600 samples	10x

RAM
4x16GBUnknownBench 98%, 9,153 samples	21x
9ASF1G72PZ-2G6D1 8x8GBMicronBench 92%, 150 samples	12x
2x16GBUnknownBench 91%, 46,387 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $643

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16