Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics38% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive99.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170901
Uptime3.5 Days
Run DateDec 04 '17 at 06:23
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU 32%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X-$60
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
70.3% Very good
Memory 70.6
1-Core 104
2-Core 198
70% 124 Pts
4-Core 375
8-Core 733
66% 554 Pts
64-Core 1,196
74% 1,196 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.43
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
38% Below average
Lighting 47.5
Reflection 54.8
Parallax 40.1
39% 47.5 fps
MRender 55.7
Gravity 40.3
Splatting 40.4
37% 45.5 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 38%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
420GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
99.6% Outstanding
Read 511
Write 415
Mixed 419
100% 448 MB/s
4K Read 36.3
4K Write 74.6
4K Mixed 39.2
145% 50 MB/s
DQ Read 241
DQ Write 176
DQ Mixed 96.7
103% 171 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 99.6%
Great: 134%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$80
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC26 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
83.3% Excellent
Read 160
Write 131
Mixed 132
106% 141 MB/s
4K Read 0.16
4K Write 1.25
4K Mixed 0.18
49% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 114%
WD Elements 2TB
512GB free, PID 10b8
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
16.9% Very poor
Read 35.8
Write 34.5
Mixed 31.7
43% 34 MB/s
4K Read 0.26
4K Write 1.36
4K Mixed 0.17
53% 0.59 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 16.9%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LED DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$161
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74.3% Very good
MC Read 29
MC Write 26.2
MC Mixed 25.7
77% 27 GB/s
SC Read 18.5
SC Write 26.3
SC Mixed 21.3
63% 22 GB/s
Latency 99.9
40% 99.9 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming K7 Builds (Compare 524 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $856
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback