Toshiba PORTEGE Z30-C

Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	6.27% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	72.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Toshiba PORTEGE Z30-C (all builds)
Motherboard	TOSHIBA PORTEGE Z30-C
Memory	11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170705
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Dec 07 '17 at 18:34
Run Duration	90 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	16%
CPU Throttled	99%

PC Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6500U 102,213 User benchmarks, average bench 46% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	60.9% Good	Memory 79.2 1-Core 89.2 2-Core 167 66% 112 Pts	4-Core 248 8-Core 253 33% 250 Pts	64-Core 253 16% 253 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 60.9% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake) 362,113 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Toshiba(1179 0015) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4849 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	6.27% Terrible	Lighting 6.63 Reflection 9.23 Parallax 6.41 5% 7.42 fps	MRender 8.62 Gravity 5.97 Splatting 13.1 8% 9.22 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.27% Great: 5%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNJ256G8NY 256GB 12,683 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 94GB free (System drive) Firmware: JYTA0101 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 265 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 452 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (A9) Unknown 100 100 100 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 199 199 0 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 22 (C2) HDA temperature 64 32 292059021348 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	72.9% Very good	Read 496 Write 410 Mixed 301 89% 403 MB/s	4K Read 9.94 4K Write 54.5 4K Mixed 29.6 82% 31.3 MB/s	DQ Read 13.7 DQ Write 60.3 DQ Mixed 17 19% 30.3 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 72.9% Great: 98%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 2x8GB 30,591 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	58.6% Above average	MC Read 20.9 MC Write 22.3 MC Mixed 18.6 59% 20.6 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 20.5 SC Mixed 18.8 51% 17.9 GB/s	Latency 82 49% 82 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 58.6% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PORTEGE Z30-C Builds (Compare 174 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 44%

Speed boat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba PORTEGE Z30-C

CPU
Core i5-6200UIntelBench 41%, 135,462 samples	66x
Core i7-6500UIntelBench 46%, 102,213 samples	43x
Core i7-6600UIntelBench 45%, 31,982 samples	34x

GPU
HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 4%, 362,113 samples	174x

SSD
THNSNJ256G8NY 256GBToshibaBench 76%, 12,683 samples	25x
THNSNK256GVN8 256GBToshibaBench 64%, 2,371 samples	22x
MZNTY256HDHP-00000 256GBSamsungBench 87%, 2,168 samples	10x

RAM
M471B1G73EB0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 27%, 39,427 samples	28x
M471B1G73QH0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 28%, 40,451 samples	15x
HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 1x8GBHynixBench 28%, 77,702 samples	12x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16