PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 26.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 (all builds) |
Memory | 9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20140403 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Dec 27 '17 at 04:05 |
Run Duration | 148 Seconds |
Run User | BRA-User |
Background CPU | 19% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
57.9%
Above average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD HD 7950-$290
Sapphire(174B 3000) 3GB
CLim: 925 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 17.12.1
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
26.6%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
59.2%
Above average
|
||||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
136GB free (System drive)
Firmware: KC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
52.5%
Above average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
33.1%
Below average
|
||||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 379x |
FX-8320AMD $175Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 102x |
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 82x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 44x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 43x |
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 29x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 53% - Above average | Total price: $729 |