Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.6%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics55% is a reasonable 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (65%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
MotherboardAsus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170607
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 29 '17 at 19:37
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 65%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
AMD FX-8320-$106
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
60.6% Good
SC Int 84.4
SC Float 71.3
SC Mixed 77.8
62% 77.8 Pts
QC Int 321
QC Float 277
QC Mixed 304
68% 300 Pts
MC Int 520
MC Float 446
MC Mixed 512
74% 493 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-$329
Gigabyte(1458 3624) 3GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 1451 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
55% Above average
Lighting 149
Reflection 114
Parallax 206
52% 156 fps
MRender 124
Gravity 168
Splatting 96
57% 130 fps
Poor: 52%
This bench: 55%
Great: 69%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$140
99GB free
Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
SYSTEM NCQ 4KALIGNED SSD TRIM S.M.A.R.T
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 69% Great: 116%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$79
3.5TB free
Firmware: 80.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
NCQ 5400 RPM !4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
52% Above average
Read 62.7
Write 118
Mixed 84
66% 88.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.86
4K Write 2.66
4K Mixed 0.26
114% 1.26 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 52%
Great: 84%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$90
3.5TB free
Firmware: 80.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
NCQ 5400 RPM 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
51.9% Above average
Read 62.1
Write 118
Mixed 83.4
66% 87.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.82
4K Write 2.37
4K Mixed 0.26
107% 1.15 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 99%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$49
3.5TB free
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
NCQ 7200 RPM !4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
52.7% Above average
Read 67.6
Write 116
Mixed 84.4
67% 89.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.84
4K Write 2.45
4K Mixed 0.23
106% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 1866 CL9 Series 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
54.2% Above average
MC Read 23.1
MC Write 15.5
MC Mixed 19.4
55% 19.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.5
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 14.4
33% 11.6 GB/s
Latency 57.9
69% 57.9 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 84%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical 970 PRO GAMING/AURA Builds (Compare 5,003 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA - $143

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $878
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $280Nvidia GTX 1070 $430Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $90
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $290Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $275Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $140
Intel Core i5-7600K $210AMD RX 480 $400Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $110
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $205SanDisk Extreme 64GB $50
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $931SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $53Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $220SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback