PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
Graphics | 18.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 50.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock Z77 Extreme4 (all builds) |
Memory | 7.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20121128 |
Uptime | 32.7 Days |
Run Date | Jan 03 '18 at 18:39 |
Run Duration | 225 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 29% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-3570K-$136
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 0.7 GHz (avg)
|
33%
Below average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD HD 7950-$290
MSI(1462 2761) 3GB
CLim: 960 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 17.11.1
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
18.1%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
57%
Above average
|
||||
50.3%
Above average
|
||||
71.5%
Very good
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M379B5273DH0-YK0 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
28.3%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples | 1,521x |
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples | 948x |
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 556x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 309x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 268x |
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples | 237x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 60% - Good | Total price: $581 |