Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 31% Sail boat	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 31% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	29.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	203% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (74%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171211
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 04 '18 at 17:44
Run Duration	225 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	74%

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195 144,475 User benchmarks, average bench 69% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	73.3% Very good	Memory 75.4 1-Core 106 2-Core 200 72% 127 Pts	4-Core 382 8-Core 730 66% 556 Pts	64-Core 1,070 66% 1,070 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 73.3% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100 111,509 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Asus(1043 8554) CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.59 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	29.6% Poor	Lighting 36.9 Reflection 36 Parallax 32.3 30% 35.1 fps	MRender 37.7 Gravity 33.3 Splatting 34.4 29% 35.1 fps
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 29.6% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 151GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	203% Outstanding	Read 2,075 Write 1,203 Mixed 1,178 327% 1,486 MB/s	4K Read 41.9 4K Write 60.1 4K Mixed 32.5 137% 44.9 MB/s	DQ Read 149 DQ Write 94.4 DQ Mixed 57.4 60% 100 MB/s
Poor: 142% ↑ This bench: 203% Great: 236%
Adata Premier Pro SP900 128GB-$40 2,820 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 28GB free Firmware: 5.0.7b Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 2928204 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 89 89 -18794776876936 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 5037 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 1016 (B1) Unknown 0 0 3 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 39 57 55838310439 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 2928204 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 2928204 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 2928204 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 9064 (EA) Unknown 0 0 9548 (F1) Unknown 0 0 9548 (F2) Unknown 0 0 14889	45.5% Average	Read 269 Write 110 Mixed 164 40% 181 MB/s	4K Read 21.9 4K Write 56.3 4K Mixed 11.1 77% 29.8 MB/s	DQ Read 141 DQ Write 120 DQ Mixed 32.8 51% 97.9 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 45.5% Great: 80%
WD Red 8TB (2016)-$180 4,231 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2TB free Firmware: 83.H0A83 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 132 132 112 (03) Spinup time 153 153 38684262807 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 172 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 140 140 15 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 410 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 170 (16) Unknown 100 100 100 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 182 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 182 (C2) HDA temperature 196 196 176094904353 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	67% Good	Read 116 Write 117 Mixed 120 89% 118 MB/s	4K Read 0.87 4K Write 1.57 4K Mixed 0.41 111% 0.95 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 67% Great: 97%
Seagate ST31500541AS 1.5TB 9,968 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 170GB free Firmware: CC34 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 115 99 92137053 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6802 (05) Reallocated sector count 93 93 311 (07) Seek error rate 63 58 68754130909 (09) Power-on hours count 86 86 12438 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 93 93 7491 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 99 88 17180198434 (BD) vendor-specific 97 97 3 (BE) vendor-specific 62 57 638910502 (C2) HDA temperature 38 43 68719476774 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 36 30 92137053 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -13700945648304 (F1) Unknown 100 253 672514075 (F2) Unknown 100 253 1840348247	35.5% Below average	Read 68.6 Write 55.1 Mixed 60.8 46% 61.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.42 4K Write 1.21 4K Mixed 0.29 72% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 35.5% Great: 56%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95 81,608 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 104GB free Firmware: CC32 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 105 99 4368 (03) Spinup time 93 92 0 (04) Start/Stop count 93 93 8180 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 75 60 31733352 (09) Power-on hours count 82 82 16162 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 92 92 8726 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 96 178 (BD) vendor-specific 90 90 10 (BE) vendor-specific 63 55 622133285 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 1380 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 95 95 11134 (C2) HDA temperature 37 45 68719476773 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 11 4 4368 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -111699214452829 (F1) Unknown 100 253 2276004941 (F2) Unknown 100 253 4146981705	39.5% Below average	Read 71.7 Write 64 Mixed 65.6 50% 67.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 6.18 4K Mixed 0.34 172% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 39.5% Great: 75%
Hitachi HDS724040ALE640 4TB-$465 6,270 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 78GB free Firmware: MJAOA3B0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 137 137 77 (03) Spinup time 135 135 51580371465 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 13528 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 117 117 36 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 12684 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 11865 (C0) Power-off retract count 89 89 13771 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 89 89 13771 (C2) HDA temperature 171 171 240519479331 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	44.1% Average	Read 75.2 Write 78.1 Mixed 92.8 62% 82.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.84 4K Write 1.45 4K Mixed 0.18 82% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 44.1% Great: 91%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$43 606,405 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2933 MHz clocked @ 1467 MHz Performing below potential (94^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	102% Outstanding	MC Read 40.7 MC Write 36.7 MC Mixed 34.6 107% 37.3 GB/s	SC Read 22.9 SC Write 39.8 SC Mixed 30 88% 30.9 GB/s	Latency 89.5 45% 89.5 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 104%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,523 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	416x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	214x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	188x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	160x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	122x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $37Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $847

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)