Asus SABERTOOTH Z97 MARK 1

Performance Results


Gaming 32% Sail boat	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 25% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	39.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	77% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (63%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus SABERTOOTH Z97 MARK 1 (all builds)
Memory	9.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20151027
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 07 '18 at 19:31
Run Duration	210 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	63%

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4690K-$53 229,359 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	70.9% Very good	Memory 80 1-Core 112 2-Core 216 76% 136 Pts	4-Core 363 8-Core 333 47% 348 Pts	64-Core 392 24% 392 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 70.9% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500 94,130 User benchmarks, average bench 35% XFX(1682 3001) 3GB CLim: 1080 MHz, MLim: 1550 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 17.7 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	39.9% Below average	Lighting 52.1 Reflection 34.7 Parallax 64.9 42% 50.6 fps	MRender 32.9 Gravity 50.8 Splatting 42.8 35% 42.2 fps
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 39.9% Great: 39%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 78GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0CB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 99 99 1 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2604 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 126 (B1) Unknown 98 98 20 (B3) Unknown 99 99 1 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 99 99 1 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 45 31 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 37 (F1) Unknown 99 99 9714549599	77% Very good	Read 467 Write 339 Mixed 349 86% 385 MB/s	4K Read 39.6 4K Write 71.7 4K Mixed 18.5 122% 43.3 MB/s	DQ Read 37.4 DQ Write 74 DQ Mixed 18.9 25% 43.4 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 77% Great: 118%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$48 144,544 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 1TB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 166 160 6675 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2643 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 2563 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 103 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 10 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 2632 (C2) HDA temperature 129 99 21 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	64.5% Good	Read 142 Write 82.6 Mixed 131 90% 119 MB/s	4K Read 0.81 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.24 103% 1.12 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 64.5% Great: 112%
WD Black 750GB (2008)-$140 11,698 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 688GB free Firmware: 05.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 253 224 1233 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 866 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 84 84 11990 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 370 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 118 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 747 (C2) HDA temperature 125 98 25 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	63.4% Good	Read 117 Write 104 Mixed 99.3 80% 107 MB/s	4K Read 0.83 4K Write 2.46 4K Mixed 0.47 132% 1.25 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 63.4% Great: 65%
Toshiba MK1246GSX 120GB 772 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 112GB free Firmware: LB211A Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 1109 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 3270 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 85 85 6049 (0A) Spinup retry count 165 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 448 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 73 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 10856 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 210454183959 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 137 (DE) Loaded hours 100 100 88 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 365 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	30% Below average	Read 51.8 Write 52.7 Mixed 52.2 39% 52.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.46 4K Write 1.12 4K Mixed 0.32 75% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 30% Great: 30%
Seagate ST96812AS 60GB 1,054 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 56GB free Firmware: 3.14 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 106 100 10791152 (03) Spinup time 97 96 0 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3349 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 74 60 27229605 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 2821 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 739 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 76 76 24 (BE) vendor-specific 80 48 336658452 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 158 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 81 81 38512 (C2) HDA temperature 20 52 47244640276 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 82 48 173019726 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	22.3% Poor	Read 37.9 Write 39.5 Mixed 39 29% 38.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.51 4K Write 0.92 4K Mixed 0.31 72% 0.58 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 22.3% Great: 23%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMZ8GX3M2A1600C8 0420 F3-12800CL9-2GBRL 0215 CMZ8GX3M2A1600C8 0420 F3-12800CL9-2GBRL 12GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	51.2% Above average	MC Read 17.6 MC Write 19.1 MC Mixed 16.5 51% 17.7 GB/s	SC Read 13.2 SC Write 19.3 SC Mixed 15 45% 15.8 GB/s	Latency 80.5 50% 80.5 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 51.2% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical SABERTOOTH Z97 MARK 1 Builds (Compare 679 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 43%

Speed boat

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH Z97 MARK 1 - $272

CPU
Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples	415x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	85x
Core i5-4690KIntel $53Bench 70%, 229,359 samples	58x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	77x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	60x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	49x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	37x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	31x
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $95Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	25x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	40x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	29x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GBKingstonBench 63%, 12,722 samples	25x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 61% - Good

Total price: $929

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16