Asrock A320M-HDV

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Battle cruiser	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	16% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock A320M-HDV (all builds)
Memory	4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170417
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 11 '18 at 16:51
Run Duration	87 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 1200-$100 83,528 User benchmarks, average bench 57% AM4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	53.2% Above average	Memory 70.9 1-Core 105 2-Core 208 71% 128 Pts	4-Core 207 8-Core 209 28% 208 Pts	64-Core 207 13% 207 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 53.2% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030 185,384 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Gigabyte(1458 375D) 2GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	16% Very poor	Lighting 20 Reflection 15.7 Parallax 18.5 16% 18.1 fps	MRender 16.5 Gravity 19 Splatting 20.7 16% 18.7 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 16% Great: 15%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$30 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 48GB free (System drive) Firmware: MS2OA750 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 1 (02) Throughput performance 142 142 68 (03) Spinup time 125 125 12896960695 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 631 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 113 113 35 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3588 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 471 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 637 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 637 (C2) HDA temperature 206 206 171799805981 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	80.5% Excellent	Read 151 Write 130 Mixed 134 104% 138 MB/s	4K Read 0.37 4K Write 1.62 4K Mixed 0.17 64% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 80.5% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4DFS8213.C8FH1 1x8GB 1,167 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 2134 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	42.4% Average	MC Read 14.9 MC Write 14.5 MC Mixed 13.7 41% 14.4 GB/s	SC Read 14.5 SC Write 15 SC Mixed 14.4 42% 14.6 GB/s	Latency 99.4 40% 99.4 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 42.4% Great: 42%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A320M-HDV Builds (Compare 831 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Raft

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV

CPU
Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples	162x
Ryzen 5 2400GAMD $135Bench 63%, 127,344 samples	85x
Ryzen 3 1200AMD $100Bench 57%, 83,528 samples	82x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	103x
RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU)AMDBench 10%, 85,536 samples	50x
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	42x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	28x
A400 120GBKingston $32Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	27x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	19x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	13x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 2x4GBUnknownBench 75%, 7,488 samples	13x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $231

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16