ADD TO PC
BUILD

User System

Performance Results


Gaming 19% Surfboard	Desktop 70% Battle cruiser	Workstation 15% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	26.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	55.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	ECT
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3
Memory	6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130423
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 13 '18 at 17:19
Run Duration	117 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-6100-$68 44,863 User benchmarks, average bench 54% Socket M2, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	63.5% Good	Memory 84.5 1-Core 70 2-Core 137 60% 97.2 Pts	4-Core 238 8-Core 303 35% 270 Pts	64-Core 302 19% 302 Pts
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 63.5% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209 161,132 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Gainward(10B0 1187) 2GB CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 390.65 Performing below potential (65^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	26.4% Poor	Lighting 31.1 Reflection 28 Parallax 36 25% 31.7 fps	MRender 39.4 Gravity 36.2 Splatting 31 29% 35.5 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 26.4% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8TB8U256G1001 256GB 4,613 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 210GB free (System drive) Firmware: X4120101 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 28 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 73 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 1 (AE) Unknown 100 100 42 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 100 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 69 60 257699414047 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 100 100 16722992 (EA) Unknown 100 100 472 (F1) Unknown 253 253 377 (F2) Unknown 253 253 94 (F9) Unknown 100 100 397	55.5% Above average	Read 237 Write 221 Mixed 222 51% 227 MB/s	4K Read 26.9 4K Write 50 4K Mixed 18.6 91% 31.8 MB/s	DQ Read 137 DQ Write 110 DQ Mixed 51.6 58% 99.4 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 55.5% Great: 92%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33 94,563 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 574GB free Firmware: 01.03B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (85^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 151 144 5441 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3529 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 92 92 5970 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3526 (C0) Power-off retract count 198 198 2140 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 3529 (C2) HDA temperature 115 105 32 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	58.6% Above average	Read 106 Write 97.7 Mixed 101 77% 102 MB/s	4K Read 0.71 4K Write 2.06 4K Mixed 0.47 120% 1.08 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 58.6% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x8GB 168,538 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	31.5% Below average	MC Read 11.1 MC Write 10 MC Mixed 9.4 29% 10.2 GB/s	SC Read 8.4 SC Write 8.9 SC Mixed 10.9 27% 9.4 GB/s	Latency 72.6 55% 72.6 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 31.5% Great: 67%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback