Asrock P67 Extreme4 Gen3

Performance Results


Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 15% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	19.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	69.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock P67 Extreme4 Gen3 (all builds)
Memory	3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120424
Uptime	5.4 Days
Run Date	Jan 16 '18 at 04:29
Run Duration	151 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	32%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3570K-$136 185,516 User benchmarks, average bench 68% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	64.9% Good	Memory 83.8 1-Core 94.1 2-Core 180 70% 119 Pts	4-Core 260 8-Core 304 37% 282 Pts	64-Core 333 21% 333 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 64.9% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-Ti-$362 42,960 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Asus(1043 841F) 2GB CLim: 1254 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	19.1% Very poor	Lighting 22.4 Reflection 23.3 Parallax 26.3 18% 24 fps	MRender 31 Gravity 27.8 Splatting 19.9 21% 26.2 fps
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 19.1% Great: 29%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate 600 240GB-$215 3,595 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 95GB free (System drive) Firmware: C675 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 166 166 3060 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 78 78 20115 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1590 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 35 0 68723277859 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 100 99 0 (E7) Temperature 80 80 21 (EA) Unknown 100 100 242160 (F1) Unknown 100 100 11890 (F2) Unknown 100 100 10865 (FA) Read error retry rate 100 100 460347	69.8% Good	Read 417 Write 404 Mixed 244 79% 355 MB/s	4K Read 23.4 4K Write 61 4K Mixed 16.9 89% 33.7 MB/s	DQ Read 25.2 DQ Write 68.4 DQ Mixed 16.6 21% 36.7 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 69.8% Great: 103%
Samsung 830 64GB 4,094 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 39GB free Firmware: CXM03B1Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 22162 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1835 (B1) Unknown 96 96 115 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 60 33 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 253 253 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 15 (F1) Unknown 99 99 2019940599	37% Below average	Read 300 Write 109 Mixed 158 41% 189 MB/s	4K Read 18.9 4K Write 32.7 4K Mixed 9.85 59% 20.5 MB/s	DQ Read 21.6 DQ Write 37.5 DQ Mixed 9.82 13% 23 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 37% Great: 63%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 212GB free Firmware: JC4B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 118 99 194988551 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2383 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 79 60 93678973 (09) Power-on hours count 80 80 18318 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1838 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 52 588775459 (C2) HDA temperature 35 48 60129542179 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 40 23 194988551 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 132791798880273 (F1) Unknown 100 253 532944436 (F2) Unknown 100 253 1669411258	62.9% Good	Read 110 Write 109 Mixed 31.6 61% 83.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.81 4K Write 1.22 4K Mixed 0.37 97% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 62.9% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Sniper DDR3 1866 C9 2x4GB 9,885 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	55.1% Above average	MC Read 19.9 MC Write 20.9 MC Mixed 17.6 56% 19.5 GB/s	SC Read 14.4 SC Write 15.7 SC Mixed 15.2 43% 15.1 GB/s	Latency 73.8 54% 73.8 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 55.1% Great: 69%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P67 Extreme4 Gen3 Builds (Compare 204 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 36%

Jet ski

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asrock P67 Extreme4 Gen3 - $170

CPU
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	65x
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples	43x
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	30x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	22x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	15x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	14x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	15x
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $95Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	8x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	7x

RAM
Ripjaws DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBG.SKILLBench 55%, 10,150 samples	11x
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBG.SKILLBench 56%, 22,320 samples	11x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 20,667 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $711

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16