| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor. |
| Graphics | 13.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | 32% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus P5Q-PRO (all builds) |
| Memory | 1.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20090223 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 17 '18 at 23:06 |
| Run Duration | 108 Seconds |
| Run User | DEU-User |
| Background CPU | 25% |
PC Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
28.7%
Poor
|
29% 47.5 Pts
|
13% 98.9 Pts
|
8% 132 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 560 Ti-$188
MSI(1462 2382) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 344.11
|
13.3%
Very poor
|
13% 15.2 fps
|
15% 18.2 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
32%
Below average
|
22% 103 MB/s
|
69% 25 MB/s
|
15% 26.9 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
|
15.4%
Very poor
|
16% 5.57 GB/s
|
8% 2.73 GB/s
|
21% 194 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P5Q-PRO Builds (Compare 363 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P5Q-PRO
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples | 79x |
| Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 32x |
| Core2 Duo E8500Intel $110Bench 42%, 18,841 samples | 28x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 4870ATIBench 9%, 22,563 samples | 26x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 13x |
| GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 12x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 52% - Above average | Total price: $189 |