MSI X399 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B09)

Performance Results


Gaming 81% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 103% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	232% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Micro-Star MS-7B09
Motherboard	MSI X399 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B09) (all builds)
Memory	27.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171218
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 30 '18 at 00:37
Run Duration	216 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$225 23,641 User benchmarks, average bench 77% SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	73.5% Very good	Memory 64 1-Core 117 2-Core 227 74% 136 Pts	4-Core 444 8-Core 901 79% 672 Pts	64-Core 2,351 146% 2,351 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 73.5% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Asus(1043 85F1) CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	102% Outstanding	Lighting 120 Reflection 182 Parallax 168 98% 157 fps	MRender 127 Gravity 166 Splatting 122 112% 138 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 1TB-$130 21,936 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 970GB free Firmware: M0CR040 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2693 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 336 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 4 (AE) Unknown 100 100 52 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 67 51 210454642721 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 100 0 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 3919286785 (F7) Unknown 100 100 122509701 (F8) Unknown 100 100 70915091 (B4) Unknown 0 0 4400 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0	74.1% Very good	Read 483 Write 338 Mixed 340 86% 387 MB/s	4K Read 25.1 4K Write 61 4K Mixed 15.6 90% 33.9 MB/s	DQ Read 206 DQ Write 143 DQ Mixed 49.2 71% 133 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 74.1% Great: 105%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150 38,097 User benchmarks, average bench 241% 790GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	232% Outstanding	Read 1,840 Write 1,516 Mixed 1,261 342% 1,539 MB/s	4K Read 51.3 4K Write 104 4K Mixed 40.2 184% 65.3 MB/s	DQ Read 250 DQ Write 208 DQ Mixed 84.5 103% 181 MB/s
Poor: 157% ↑ This bench: 232% Great: 302%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150 38,097 User benchmarks, average bench 241% 657GB free Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	243% Outstanding	Read 1,840 Write 1,514 Mixed 1,296 344% 1,550 MB/s	4K Read 53.3 4K Write 123 4K Mixed 54.2 215% 76.7 MB/s	DQ Read 282 DQ Write 226 DQ Mixed 26.3 82% 178 MB/s
Poor: 157% ↑ This bench: 243% Great: 302%
Crucial MX200 500GB-$90 17,487 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 417GB free Firmware: MU01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 718 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 512 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 99 99 37 (AE) Unknown 100 100 62 (B4) Unknown 0 0 5564 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 65 51 210454773795 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 99 99 1 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 32594870080 (F7) Unknown 100 100 1018800374 (F8) Unknown 100 100 261284480	82.6% Excellent	Read 506 Write 396 Mixed 391 96% 431 MB/s	4K Read 27.1 4K Write 69 4K Mixed 23.8 108% 40 MB/s	DQ Read 120 DQ Write 137 DQ Mixed 30.5 50% 95.8 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 82.6% Great: 105%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136 31,988 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 1.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 184 177 7758 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3661 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 91 91 6847 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 884 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 388 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 177 177 70801 (C2) HDA temperature 119 109 33 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	84.5% Excellent	Read 156 Write 139 Mixed 131 106% 142 MB/s	4K Read 0.81 4K Write 2.17 4K Mixed 0.2 96% 1.06 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 84.5% Great: 87%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 968GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 182 177 5891 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6083 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 88 88 8994 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1135 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 189 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 166 166 104300 (C2) HDA temperature 120 110 30 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	61.6% Good	Read 99.1 Write 115 Mixed 109 81% 108 MB/s	4K Read 0.62 4K Write 1.88 4K Mixed 0.21 83% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 61.6% Great: 83%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GB 76,101 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing below potential (99^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	131% Outstanding	MC Read 50 MC Write 56.3 MC Mixed 50.5 149% 52.3 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 31.9 SC Mixed 21.3 64% 22.5 GB/s	Latency 116 34% 116 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 131% Great: 106%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X399 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B09) Builds (Compare 262 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 99%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 120%

UFO

Motherboard: MSI X399 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B09)

CPU
Ryzen TR 1950XAMD $225Bench 77%, 23,641 samples	123x
Ryzen TR 1920XAMD $800Bench 78%, 10,440 samples	43x
Ryzen TR 1900XAMD $110Bench 76%, 7,071 samples	37x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	38x
RTX 2080Nvidia $407Bench 124%, 316,424 samples	19x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	15x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	17x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	13x
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $249Bench 279%, 18,356 samples	13x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GBCorsairBench 96%, 10,311 samples	12x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	9x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 8x8GBUnknownBench 160%, 29 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 70% - Good

Total price: $753

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16